I have been reading these past 2 days an important tract which appeared last year and which pillories
the state of British government - Stand and Deliver. It suggests that the performance of the British
government system is so poor as to require a total overhaul and indeed formal “Treaty”. The BBC
gives good coverage to
the author in this piece
His more radical ideas are based around bringing in new feedback systems into the working of governments.He likens government at present to a gardener planting seeds, telling people what the garden will look like but then never actually checking whether or not they have grown as planned (instead spending lots of time checking on the sharpness of a spade or the water efficiency of a hose). That is in contrast to the private sector, which checks on the outcomes of spending continually.
A similar discipline needs to come into government, he says. There has been progress with the National Audit Office, the Office for National Statistics and select committees, he says, but he wants them all brought under the umbrella of the second chamber (the House of Lords at the moment) becoming a "Resulture" able to score policies and kill off those ones which are not working.
I call this
a “tract” since it is not the normal “run of the mill” academic,
political or technocratic treatise. Its author is thoroughly familiar with the
political and technocratic worlds (less so the academic) and is very angry with
what he has experienced……
So it is a very individual take on the British system of government –
despite his consultancy experience in other countries and his emphasis on the
need for “benchmarking”, only the Swiss system really seems to rate for him.
My first reaction as I read the opening pages was to try to remember
when I had last read such an onslaught…… Simon Jenkins’ “Accountable to None –
the Tory Nationalisation of Britain” (1996) and Thatcher
and Sons (2006) were both powerful exposes of the excesses of the 1979-2006
governments; Christopher Foster’s British
Government in Crisis (2005) was more measured and brought his particular
rich blend of academia and consultancy. It took a search of the latter’s book
to remind me of the title and author of the famous expose of civil service
waste which had first attracted Margaret Thatcher’s attention - Leslie Chapman’s
Your
Disobedient Servant (1979). And 2005 saw the launching of the Power Inquiry
into the discontents about British government……
Oddly, however, none of these books appear in Straw’s three page and
rather idiosyncratic bibliography.
The book itself promises to give an “organisational” rather than
political take on the subject – which suited me perfectly as this has been my
perspective since I first went into “government” (local) in 1968 – absorbing
the more radical challenge to hierarchies and power…..Faced in turn with the
challenge in 1975 of becoming one of the senior figures on the new Strathclyde
Region, I used my position to develop more open and inclusive policy-making
processes – extending to junior officials and councillors, community activists.
With a huge Labour majority we could afford to be generous to any opposition!
And, even under Thatcher, the Scottish Office Ministers were conciliatory – “partnership”
was the name of the game we helped develop and was most evident in the success
of the “Glasgow” revival. Straddling
the worlds of academia and politics, I was able to initiate some important
networks to try to effect social change
It was this experience of cooperating with a variety of actors in
different agencies I took with me when I opted in 1990 to go into consultancy
work in central Europe – to help develop the different sort of government
capacity they needed there……then, for 8 years in Central Asia. I was lucky in
being allowed to operate there to take advantage of “windows of opportunity”
and not be hogbound with the stupid procurement rules…but I became highly
critical of the EC development programme as you will see in this 2011 paper The Long
Game – not the Logframe
Throughout this entire 45 year-period, I have been keeping up with the
literature on change and public management – so am intrigued by this book of Ed
Straw’s which promises to bring an organisational
perspective to the frustrations we all have with government systems…….
It was published more than a year ago; has a dedicated website but, from
my google search, seems to have gone down like a lead balloon. Tomorrow I hope
to present his arguments and explore how well the book fares on the following
tests -
- “resonating” with the times?
- a “convincing” argument?
- demonstrated “feasibility”?
- opposition identified?
- sources of support?
- “resonating” with the times?
- a “convincing” argument?
- demonstrated “feasibility”?
- opposition identified?
- sources of support?
No comments:
Post a Comment