what you get here

This is not a blog which opines on current events. It rather uses incidents, books (old and new), links and papers to muse about our social endeavours.
So old posts are as good as new! And lots of useful links!

The Bucegi mountains - the range I see from the front balcony of my mountain house - are almost 120 kms from Bucharest and cannot normally be seen from the capital but some extraordinary weather conditions allowed this pic to be taken from the top of the Intercontinental Hotel in late Feb 2020
Showing posts with label framing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label framing. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2022

The Stories People Tell to make sense of the world - part VI of a series

Political parties in the US and UK apparently used to be broad coalitions but have become (at least on the right) ideological sects. And that certainly seem confirmed in the nominations presented yesterday for the UK Prime Minister – a position which has become vacant due to Boris Johnson’s long-awaited resignation.

As readers know, I try to avoid comment on so-called “current affairs” but it is simply worth noting that the extremist faction of the Conservative party (very much encouraged by Johnson) has now gained such a powerful hold on the party that all eight candidates who yesterday secured nominations are devotees of the “small state” idea. 

More in Common is an interesting organisation with teams in France, Germany, UK and US which develop communication strategies that can help unite people across the lines of division and strengthen people’s sense of belonging and common identity. One of their recent reports divided the UK population into the following 7 groups (with the percentage indicating the importance of the group) 

-Progressive Activists (13%): A powerful and vocal group for whom politics is at the core of their identity, and who seek to correct the historic marginalisation of groups based on their race, gender, sexuality, wealth and other forms of privilege. They are politically-engaged, critical, opinionated, frustrated, cosmopolitan and environmentally conscious.

–Civic Pragmatists (13%): A group that cares about others, at home or abroad, and who are turned off by the divisiveness of politics. They are charitable, concerned, exhausted, community-minded, open to compromise, and socially liberal.

–Disengaged Battlers (12%): A group that feels that they are just keeping their heads above water, and who blame the system for its unfairness. They are tolerant, insecure, disillusioned, disconnected, overlooked, and socially liberal.

–Established Liberals (12%): A group that has done well and means well towards others, but also sees a lot of good in the status quo. They are comfortable, privileged, cosmopolitan, trusting, confident, and pro-market.

–Loyal Nationals (18%): A group that is anxious about the threats facing Britain and facing themselves. They are proud, patriotic, tribal, protective, threatened, aggrieved, and frustrated about the gap between the haves and the have-nots.

–Disengaged Traditionalists (17%): A group that values a well-ordered society and takes pride in hard work, and wants strong leadership that keeps people in line. They are self-reliant, ordered, patriotic, tough-minded, suspicious, and disconnected.

–Backbone Conservatives (15%): A group who are proud of their country, optimistic about Britain’s future outside of Europe, and who keenly follow the news, mostly via traditional media sources. They are nostalgic, patriotic, stalwart, proud, secure, confident, and relatively engaged with politics 

Each of these groups tells – or frames - a story of the world as it understands it. And human beings have told stories since Adam and Eve. But it’s the modern world – and the advertising of the past century – which has really made us aware of this. And it was sociologist Erving Goffman’s “Frame Analysis” of 1974 which introduced the term. It was a decade later before I heard the term for the first time – when I was taking the UK’s very first course in Policy Analysis. I can still remember the impact it made. But somehow its secret was guarded in the halls of marketing power for another couple of decades and it was 2004 before “Don’t Think of an Elephant – know your values and frame the debate” by George Lakoff made an appearance - Lakoff was an undergraduate at MIT under Noam Chomsky, and was already well established as a linguist by the mid-1970s when he was one of a handful of pioneering academics establishing the foundations of cognitive linguistics, a discipline that brought an understanding of the brain to bear on theories of language and meaning. In cognitive linguistics, the meaning of a word is not just a simple dictionary definition but a cognitive frame associated with a particular word in a particular language community. Other mechanisms, such as metaphor and prototyping, can also be involved

Framing Public Issues (US Frameworks Institute 2006) quickly followed. But it is Finding Frames – new ways to engage the UK public (2010) which I find the most satisfactory account of the meaning and development of Frame Analysis. It’s a 120-page report issued by Oxfam and the Department for International Development on how a more effective marketing strategy could be used by charities in their funding appeals to the general public. And it’s linked to another report Common Cause – the case for working with our cultural values (2010). The second chapter of “Finding Frames” looks at social values - 

Perhaps the best known and certainly the most widely applied and validated of the values frameworks, comprises 56 principal value ‘labels’ that can be boiled down into just ten value types (Schwartz and Boehnke 2004) which can best be understood in terms of the degree to which they are compatible or in conflict with one another. People find it difficult to hold certain combinations of values at the same time, whereas other combinations are relatively easy to hold simultaneously - eg people who rate wealth and status as important tend not to rate social justice and living in a world at peace as equally important. 

Storytelling – bewitching the modern mind by Frenchman Christian Salmon (2014) puts the issue in the wider political context it needs. 

The more recent Framers – human advantage in an age of technology and turmoil  K Cukier, F de Vericourt and V Schonberger (2021) initially disappointed me since it didn’t seem to offer the analytical elements I had been expecting. It seemed simply to string a series of stories together in a rather undisciplined way. And then, as I flicked to the middle of the book, I alighted on a story which made me realise that the story-telling was in fact a far more powerful method than the analytical approach. As the intro puts it - 

Framing is so fundamental to human cognition that even those who study the workings of the mind rarely focused on it until relatively recently. Its importance was overshadowed by other mental capabilities, such as sensing and memory. But as people have become more aware of the need to improve their decision-making, the role of frames as fundamental to choosing and acting well has moved from the background to center stage.

Friday, January 10, 2020

57 Varieties of Capitalism

Last October I developed a table in what was probably the most important post of the year – one in a series about capitalism. The table listed 11 academic disciplines; showed how 3 “schools” of thinking could be discerned in each discipline; and how they tended to treat the subject.
The key variable distinguishing these schools was the extent to which they recognised the realities of power. I named them “market theoreticians”; “mixed” and “critical-realist” respectively.
The subsequent matrix produced 33 different “lens” with which to try to understand the system which rules over us with Minotaur-like voraciousness. I was proud of the result – I had never seen it done before. Of course there was a school of political economists which developed in the 1980s and 90s called the Varieties of Capitalism approach – but this focused on essentially two basic models. 

My matrix is distinctive in 3 ways – first that so many academic fields are listed. At best people will mention economics, sociology and political science – with little recognition that economics has several very different sub-fields. And I might have added “complexity science” which has rapidly developed its own specialism.
The second original aspect of the table is the recognition of three very different “schools” or approaches…Most economists, of course, still adhere to highly theoretical and unrealistic assumptions which were explored (and exploded) in this recent post
But political and behavioural economists – let alone the sociologists, geographers and even psychologists have been muscling in….Indeed I have had to add the psychologists to the table…giving 36 "lens" or squares

And the final distinctive aspect of the table is the identification of so many books – almost 50 covering most of squares…
I have selected the books which appear in the table according to whether they portray a world of “perfect competition” in which, according to the theory, no one has any power or, at the other extreme, a world of large companies and groups exercising power (legal and illegal). 

We are prone these days to use ideological labels too easily – so I want to avoid that by using less obvious labels.
- “Market theoreticians” (column 3) are those whose writing is based on the totally unrealistic assumptions of perfect competition
“Mixed economy” therefore covers those who clearly argue for what used to be called “the mixed economy” and are quite clear that they wish a better, more balanced capitalism;
- The “critical-realist” label covers those who go further in their critical approach, extending their analysis to the role exercised by dubious and illegitimate power players who try to buy democracy and whose activities threaten the planet’s very survival.

Some academic disciplines, of course, like economics, are almost exclusively associated with one school (market) whereas others are more pluralist 
Needless to say, the allocation to one particular column is arbitrary and could be disputed – as can the choice of illustrative authors and books (not all of which I have actually read)
The table is, however, a rather superb example of what post-modernism has done to us – which I will explore in a subsequent post   

The table is, however, a good example of what post-modernism has done to us

 Key Texts about the future of capitalism – by academic discipline and “approach”

 

Academic

Discipline


1. Critical-Realist

2. Mixed approach

3. “market theoreticians”

 Economics

 Debt and Neo-Feudalism; Michael Hudson (2012)

 Credo – economic beliefs in a world of crisis; Brian Davey (2015). Davey is not a career or conventional economist!

 

23 Things they didn’t tell you about capitalism; Ha Joon-Chang (2010)

People, Power and Profits – progressive capitalism for an age of discontent; Joseph Stiglitz (2019)

The Future of Capitalism – facing new anxieties; Paul Collier (2018)

Shifts and Shocks – what we’ve learned, and still have to, from the financial crisis; Martin Wolf (2014)

Conceptualising Capitalism – institutions, evolution, future; Geoff Hodgson (2015)

 

Why Globalisation Works; Martin Wolf (2004)

 

 

most of the discipline

Economic history

 

Capitalism and its Economics – a critical History; Douglas Dowd (2000)

Never Let a Good Crisis go to waste; Philip Mirowski  (2013)

 

 Crashed – how a decade of financial crises changed the world Adam Tooze (2018)

 

Economic historians by definition have a strong sense of political and other institutions

Political economy

Inside Capitalism – an intro to political economy; Paul Phillips (2003)

Susan Strange

- States and Markets (1988)

- Casino Capitalism ; (1986)

- The Retreat of the State (1994)

 

Austerity – the history of a dangerous idea; Mark Blyth (2013)

Yanis Varoufakis

- And the Weak Suffer what they must – Europe, austerity and the threat to global stability (2016)

- The Global Minotaur (2012)

 

The discipline still rediscovering itself but, again, by definition, has a strong sense of the importance of institutions

Political

Science

 

 

 

 

 

Crisis without End - the unravelling of western prosperity: A Gamble (2014)

 Democracy Incorporated – managed democracy and the spectre of inverted totalitarianism; Sheldon Wolin (2008)

Paul Hirst eg Revisiting Associative Democracy; ed Westall (2011).

 The Great Disruption – human nature and the reconstitution of social order; Francis Fukuyama (1999) 

Mammon’s Kingdom – an essay on Britain, Now; David Marquand (2015)

Only a few brave pol scientists trespass into the economic field – although it is becoming more fashionable

Policy analysis/Think Tanks

 

“The Locust and the Bee – predators and creators in capitalism’s future”; G Mulgan (2015)

An Intro to Capitalism (IEA 2018)

Sociology

Wolfgang Streeck.

- How will Capitalism End?; (2016)

- Buying Time – the delayed crisis of democratic capitalism (2013)

End of capitalism? Michael Mann (2013)

Capitalism; Geoff Ingham (2008)

 

 

 

Vampire Capitalism – fractured societies and alternative futures; Paul Kennedy (2017)

 

 

The sociological voice is still inspired by C Wright Mills, Veblen, Weber and Durkheim

Geography

David Harvey

- Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism (2014)

- The Enigma of Capital (2010)

- A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism (2005).

 

Danny Dorling

- A Better Politics – how government can make us happier (2016

- Injustice (2014)

The geographers are a bolshie lot - with a strong sense of geo-politics

Environment

Come On! Capitalism, short-termism, population and the destruction of the planet; (Club of Rome 2018).                            

Why we can’t agree about Climate Change; Mike Hulme (2009)

Natural Capitalism – the next industrial revolution; Paul Hawken (1999)

they pride themselves on their technocracy

 

 

 

 

Management and man’t studies

“The Dictionary of Alternatives – utopianism and organisation”; M Parker (2007)

Rebalancing Society; Henry Mintzberg (2014)

Peter Senge

Charles Handy

Most mant writers are apologists – apart from the critical mant theorists

 

Religious studies

Laudato-Si – Pope Francis’ Encyclical (2015). Accessible in its entirety here

 

 

The Crisis of global capitalism – Pope Benedict XVI’s social encyclical and the future of political economy; ed A Pabst (2011)

 

Questions of Business Life; Higginson (2002)

Psychology

Herbert Marcuse

What about me – the struggle for identity in a market based society?; Paul Verhaeghe (2014) 

 

 

 

Journalism

Post Capitalism – a guide to our Future; Paul Mason (2015) ….

 The Capitalism Papers – Fatal Flaws of an Obsolete System; Jerry Mander (2012).

 

How Good Can we be – ending the mercenary society Will Hutton (2015)

 Capitalism 3.0 Peter Barnes (2006)

They don’t enjoy the tenure of the academics (altho Hutton is a college Director)


Monday, June 24, 2019

Reason as the servant of Passion

One of the delights of my house in the Carpathian Mountains is the library – with books cascading from shelving which started almost 20 years ago with a magnificent oak bookshelf and now bulge over doors, windows, corners and alcoves – anywhere not already invaded by paintings….
Coming back to the house immediately exposes me to a rich serendipity of texts many of which have lain there for years. Or which demand - and repay - rereading.
This past week has therefore been a bit of a reading week for me and I would like to share some of the gems I’ve come across not only in each of those two categories - but in a third one which is becoming more significant these days – the “virtual” one.   

The Righteous Mind – why good people are divided by politics and religion” by Jonathan Haidt (2012) has lain undisturbed on my shelves since it arrived 4 years ago – but is one of the best psychological treatments of political issues I have read. And that includes Leo Abse’s dissection of leading politicians - “Private Member” (1973) which was bettered only by Alaister Mant’s strangely neglected “Leaders we Deserve”.
Psychologists were, of course, in the van of the reaction (which started a decade or so ago) against the overly rationalistic explanations of events - Thinking Fast and Slow; Daniel Kahneman (2012) is probably the best known of these - although it's too technical and dense for me. He may have won a Nobel prize but I gave up after a few pages - and had the same reaction just now when I pulled it down from another shelf
George Lakoff is a psychologist - and much more readable - who has been exploring this terrain - and that of "framing" (see recommended reading) - for more than two decades eg “Moral Politics – how Liberals and Politics Think” (1996); and The Political Mind – a cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics (2008).
 

Haidt’s treatment, however, shines for three reasons – first, it takes us beyond the narrow scope of a specialist and brings in, to illustrate his points, the wisdom of such writers as social philosopher David Hume and sociologist Emile Durkheim. Indeed Hume’s quip about “passion being the servant of reason” serves as the trigger for the text  
The core of the book, secondly, rests on what he identifies as six moral foundations of society viz the care/harm; fairness/cheating; loyalty/betrayal; authority/subversion; sanctity/degradation; and liberty/oppression dichotomies. He then uses this classification to suggest that the strength of the political right is their understanding of the importance of this entire range – whereas the left tend to emphasise only half of the range of values…
The final strength of the book is the way it’s structured – with the 5-6 key points of each chapter being clearly laid out and summarized. I’m an impatient reader (there are too many other interesting books waiting) and this made it much easier to skim…

It also uses the occasional diagram (something I always appreciate) one of which classifies people according to the extent to which they express EMPATHY (or “feeling for others” axis one) or SYSTEMISATION (or “classifying things or concepts” - axis two). Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant both figure in the bottom right quadrant (sociable Kant less so than the almost autistic father of utilitarianism). 

But the diagram made me realise that I too fall into that same bottom right quadrant! 
I may be a Leo but of the more retiring sort - as I learned when I took the Belbin test expecting to be confirmed as a Leader but was exposed as a "resource person". 
I was always more of a networker – if one with a strong penchant for books and typologies

Recommended Reading/viewing
The whole issue of "framing" (story-telling) is quite fascinating and is becoming a major issue as we increasingly understand the scale of both government and corporate leaders' manipulation of us all over the past century
https://nomadron.blogspot.com/2014/07/stories-we-tell.html
Storytelling - bewitching the modern mind; Christian Salmon (2010) an epub which needs conversion to pdf
The Common Cause Handbook (2010)
Wicked Problems and Clumsy Solutions; Keith Grint (2008)
Don’t Think of an Elephant – know your values and frame the debate”; George Lakoff (2004)

Friday, November 2, 2018

When the spark ignites

Sometimes a nation or a people feel such humiliation and anger about the way they are being treated that it takes only one incident to spark off a protest which makes the prevailing regime crumble. It’s said that one picture is worth (variously) a thousand or ten thousand words - although, these days, I would put the equation at more like a billion words and I would focus on dramatic actions - rather than pictures.  
Last month I discussed a neglected classic which explored the question of how people such as Jesus Christ and Mahatmi Gandhi came to inspire the world….Emile Zola’s famous J’Accuse letter may have been more than a hundred years ago but inspired one of the western world’s first social movements – which split France in half.
Saul Alinsky’s writings set in motion several generations of community activists. A black woman refused in December 1955 to obey racist instructions to move to the back of a bus…- thereby starting what became the US Civil Rights movement…….Police brutality has often been the cause of riots eg the Watts Riots of August 1965 in Los Angeles.
But it was probably Jan Palach’s act of setting himself on fire on 16 January 1969 in the centre of Prague (in protest against people’s indifference to the Russian invasion in the summer) which made the greatest impact. His memory stayed alive for the 20 years it took for the country to liberate itself……
 93-year old Stephane Hessel was so offended by the world’s treatment of Palestine (amongst other things) that in 2010 he published Time for Outrage (2010) which quickly climbed to the top of the best sellers….
Later that same year Mohamed Bouazizi - a Tunisian street vendor – also set himself alight in response to the confiscation of his wares by a municipal official and her aides. The subsequent riots led the then-president of Tunisia, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to step down on 14 January 2011, after 23 years in power – and became a catalyst for the wider Arab Spring.

For every such defining moment, however, there are probably a million protests which lead nowhere….. The focus of protests have been variously industrial, racial, environmental, gender, housing, invasion. What, I have to wonder, makes the difference?
In all humility I wonder whether those Romanians who have taken to the street in the past couple of years - or even those such as Dorel Sandor and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi - should perhaps not be using that experience and literature to explore more deeply that basic question…..
Romania may have had blood on the streets in December 1989 but – unlike Poland and Czechoslovakia - its intellectuals were fairly passive until then (with the honourable exception of people like Ana Blandiana and Mircea Dinescu).

Social change, after all, doesn’t come from writing, consultancy or television appearances – but from a willingness to sacrifice…… Please understand that I’m not denigrating the writers when I say that – they are necessary but not sufficient. That’s clearly one of the messages which comes from the books I’ve selected for the important reading list I’ve developed below….

How, sub-consciously, we compartmentalise the world
It’s interesting what happened as I was developing this reading list……I knew that what I wanted to do was list some of books I had found useful in what is a massive literature on the experience and tactics of social struggle….ie a grassroots movement…..But I found references slipping in which I quickly realised didn’t fit……..which dealt what we might call “reform efforts from within the system of power”…..eg the World Bank titles and the Guide to Change management….. This blog has noticed repeated instances of people writing about the same issue but doing so with totally different language, concepts and “frames of reference” and – most importantly – without realising that there were “parallel universes” in which the same conversations were being conducted….

Having noticed this, I remembered the post I had done a year ago - Is it people who change systems - or systems which change people? – in which I had recounted the “pincer movement of change” I had developed in the 1970s. This argued that significant and lasting policy change required both “push and pull” – ie a combination of grassroots pressure with insiders sympathetic to change….Twenty five years later and in a different continent I developed what I called the “opportunistic” or “windows of opportunity” theory of change which I would expound to bewildered central Asian  bureaucrats…. 
“Most of the time our systems seem impervious to change – but always (and suddenly) an opportunity arises. Those who care about the future of their society, prepare for these “windows of opportunity”. And the preparation is about analysis, mobilisation and trust.
- It is about us caring enough about our organisation and society to speak out about the need for change.
about taking the trouble to think and read about ways to improve things 
– and helping create and run networks of such change.
- And it is about establishing a personal reputation for probity and good judgement that people will follow your lead when that window of opportunity arises”.

 Reading list on social change
The selection is a very personal one and ranges from the passionate to the technical – with a  smattering of books that are more descriptive…..Temperamentally I go (at least these days) for the more analytical (and generic) works and the development literature is therefore probably a bit overrepresented (and the feminist underrepresented). Readers should also be aware that I was a strong community activist in my early days….
The first 8 titles can be read in full – as can the last 4. Strange that none of the books is written by a political scientist (with the possible exception of Gene Sharp). Machiavelli would be turning in his grave

Key Books for “social change” activists
Title

Focus
Notes
How Change Happens Duncan Green (2016)

Community groups and officials
Great overview – if from only a development experience perspective


Transition countries
Political culture
Very rare attempt to bring the insights of change management to those trying to build “rule of law” in transition and developing countries


Change agents in government
One of the best – straddling the various worlds of action, academia and officialdom – with the focus on fashioning an appropriate message and constituency for change


Charities
A great example of frame analysis – showing the importance of trying to identify the link between social values and politics

Indignez-vous; Stephane Hessel (2010)

Social justice
Inspiring pamphlet from the Frenchman whose whole life has been an inspiration to us all


Activists for global concerns
One of the most important 100 pages any social activist could read….it’s simply tragic that 8 years later, it would now be seen as revolutionary

Change agents in government
A decade on, it’s still offers one of the clearest frameworks for making government systems work for people


leaders
A must-read analysis which introduced many people to frame analysis - helps us adopt a more holistic approach

trade unionists
A story that needed telling in a media and political world which is now so hostile to working people organising to improve their lot

Environment
This is the field which has probably seen the most action – but the least results!
Change the World; Robert Quinn (2000)

Eclectic
A tragically neglected book

Regime change
The handbook for a lot of soi-disant revolutionaries….its provenance is a bit suspect….
Putting the Last First; Robert Chambers (1983)

Donors
A morally powerful book which challenged (to little avail) the “imperialist” assumptions of most technical assistance programmes

Rules for Radicals; Saul Alinsky (1971)

Community action
THE handbook for generations of activists…
the follow-up apparently to Reveille for Radicals which he published in 1946!

Occupy theory; is the first volume of a 3 vol series written by Michel Albert to mark the Occupy movement, the others being Occupy Vision and Occupy Strategy
When I googled “reading lists on social protest” I got this interesting selection https://c4aa.org/2017/02/reading-list-activism/