“Capitalism”…I
started, but the barman hopped out of a pipkin
“Capitalism”,
he countered…”That’s a flat and frothless word
I’m
a good Labour man, but if I mentioned capitalism
My
clientele would chew off their own ears
And
spit them down the barmaid’s publicised cleavage”
“All
right” I obliged “Don’t call it capitalism
Let’s
call it Mattiboko the Mighty
……..
The
poem finishes…
This
was my fearless statement
“The
Horror World can only be changed by the destruction of
Mattiboko
the Mighty,
The
Massimataxis Incoporated Supplement
And
Gumbo Jumbo the Homely Obblestrog Spectacular”
Audience
Reaction was quite encouraging
It was a serious point I was making – brought home in the current
American Democratic party debates for the Presidential nomination. One article
suggests that Saunders, to distinguish himself from Warren, needs
to clearly name his enemy….capitalism – although it’s not so long ago that Republicans were
advised to stop using that particular term.
The Financial Crash of 2008 is still with us and has certainly made it
easier to use the word (capitalism) which had been very much celebrated until
the new millennium when it started to acquire its current negative connotation
In my youth, I was a Young Socialist ( a member of the Labour party’s
youth wing) – but it was not a term I used of myself. I was a “social democrat”…a
“Labourite” and very much opposed to the “Hard Left” on the fringes of the
party who were always proud to label themselves “socialist”. Of course, if
forced to choose between the two extremes, I would have to plump for “socialist”
but was happy to occupy the middle ground – even if it meant accusations of
being a “mugwump”
I’m currently trying to find a decent readable book to recommend to
my readers about the shape of the “better system” we need to replace the
offensive thing which currently rules our lives…..and realise how difficult it is to find a term for that “thing”. Paul
Collier’s “Future of Capitalism” is one of the contenders – to
which I devoted a series of posts last month. He’s very much a pragmatist;
is happy to use the “C” word in his title but rarely (if at all) uses the “S”
word.
Another contender is Jerry Mander’s The
Capitalism Papers – Fatal Flaws of an Obsolete System (2012) which I am now
rereading for purposes of comparison (As you can also since the book can be
read in full by tapping the title).
His opening chapter (pp8/9) tells the story of a friend who said to him
“I hope you’re not going to use the “C” word!” which inspired me to this
post a few years ago.
Mander goes on to make the important distinction between “Big
Capitalism” (the multinationals) and small and medium-sized business – what others
(like Geoff Mulgan)
call “bad” and Good” Capitalism
I suddenly remembered that the famous playwright GB Shaw had written a
book called The
Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism almost a hundred years
ago – and wondered if it might tell me something.
I should warn you that, far from being a short, punchy pamphlet, it
runs to more than 500 pages and that its contents sheet alone - normally 2
pages at most – runs to 33 pages. This because of the charming habit of giving
the reader a synopsis of each chapter – and there are no fewer than 84 of them!
A modern journalist, in
a mercifully short article, suggests some parallels with the post-crash
world
But I want to persevere with my
question – why do we have so much difficulty finding a word to describe a more
sensible and acceptable system than the one which has had us by the throat for
so long????
It’s a silly question I know – since the obvious term (“socialism”) has
been maligned by the cleverest marketing of the corporate elites..…and that those who continue to use the term do so almost as a virility
symbol….
The key question, therefore, is
what term should be used to attract the support not only of the activists but of
the huge numbers of others who are, very reluctantly, supporting the populist parties???
Well certainly not “The Third Way” – nor “Diem25”!!
It’s interesting that one of the American websites trying to develop an
alternative is called The Next
System……..
Paul
Mason is by no means the only person who has taken to using the phrase “post-capitalism”
but the phrase is no more than a gentle indication we are in a transition phase
– it says nothing about where we SHOULD be going….
And few people realise that it was the father of management Peter
Drucker who first wrote (in 1993) about The
Post-Capitalist Society. I’ve just discovered the full book on the internet
– so will have to refresh my memory on its contents but it certainly isn’t
about socialism!