I’m always intrigued by confessional-type books which sketch how the
scales fell from a writer’s eyes and how (s)he began to “connect the dots” in
their various worlds ie produce a coherent account of the exercise of power.
Voltaire’s Candide
was, of course, a satire – I prefer less manipulative and anguished portrayals
of “intellectual journeys”…..which seem to be quite rare….millions of
autobiographies or memoirs which show what an interesting life the author had
or interesting times they lived in – but few hints of the sorts of deep
questions they might have been exploring…..let alone attempts to set out their
“world views”, the assumptions which sustained them and how and why experience
was forcing adjustments….
Almost before they start writing a book – be it political, financial,
economic – authors have taken decisions about how they will “frame” and tell
the story - and are writing the book to convince you of its rectitude. Don’t
expect them to share their uncertainties with you….
Patrick Chalmers is a fellow Scot born in 1966 – the generation after
mine – and, after graduating first in engineering then journalism, had several
years of contract work before landing a job with Reuters in 1994. Happy to have
such a job – initially on finance then EU affairs in Brussels – he was slow to
recognise the interests he was serving although it was in Brussels he developed
his Euroscepticism as he began to understand the extent of the
“behind-the-doors” dealing and the power of the big business lobby…..a spell as
a foreign correspondent in the Far East completed his disillusionment with the
rhetoric of democracy and he resigned in order to seek a more honourable
channel for his energies….Fraudcast
News – how bad journalism supports bogus democracies is his
(self-published) book which tells the story – with the final chapters updating
his story and giving a quietly upbeat message about “alternative journalism”…..
It was some 15 years ago I started to pose serious
questions about the conventional wisdom on the sort of “institutional change”
which people in post-communist countries were being urged to make and the
legitimacy of the bodies funding programmes of institutional reform….
I delivered a major paper Missionaries or mercenaries? on the topic to the 2007 Annual Conference of the NISPAcee network of schools of public administration; an update Play the Long Game – not the log frame! at the 2011 Conference; and have mused intermittently about public management reform, training and the use of structural funds in new member states – but realized only this week that I needed to pick out more explicitly the “theories of change” which have been implicit in the programmes of the past 4 decades…..
I delivered a major paper Missionaries or mercenaries? on the topic to the 2007 Annual Conference of the NISPAcee network of schools of public administration; an update Play the Long Game – not the log frame! at the 2011 Conference; and have mused intermittently about public management reform, training and the use of structural funds in new member states – but realized only this week that I needed to pick out more explicitly the “theories of change” which have been implicit in the programmes of the past 4 decades…..
No comments:
Post a Comment