what you get here

This is not a blog which opines on current events. It rather uses incidents, books (old and new), links and papers to muse about our social endeavours.
So old posts are as good as new! And lots of useful links!

The Bucegi mountains - the range I see from the front balcony of my mountain house - are almost 120 kms from Bucharest and cannot normally be seen from the capital but some extraordinary weather conditions allowed this pic to be taken from the top of the Intercontinental Hotel in late Feb 2020

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Le Temps Perdu – part III

Why do I persist with this little conceit of mine – pointing back to “Posts Past” – like Marcel Proust’s A La Recherche du Temps Perdu? Not just posts of previous years’ (see top right-hand corner of blog for list of titles you can access) – but even those I’ve inflicted on you so far this year? 

The answer is simple – this blog posts on “perennial” issues which repay study even years later. Very few of the 1,500 posts have dealt with “current affairs” – and then it has to be a pretty major issue eg the two UK Referenda - the 2014 one on Scottish Independence and the 2016 one on Brexit 

Current Affairs” is like a conjuring trick – our fixation on the action distracts our attention from the real levers of powerIndeed one of the French words for entertainment is “distraction” and, since the times of Celine and Guy Debord, the French have recognised the dangers posed by the “society of the spectacle”.

Americans have seen such disdain as elitist – with only Neil Postman’s “Amusing ourselves to Death” (1983), Jerry Mander’s “Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television” and Douglas Kellner’s various books daring to voice it 

This is the third in a series of this year’s posts I am listing this week in celebration of hitting the 1,500th post earlier in the month. It’s a fairly typical selection…. Starting with scepticism, moving on to groupthink, John Berger, capitalism, Human nature, intellectual history, hyperlinks to the world’s best English-speaking journals, the learning process, the role of the state…to…extinction…

Each post with a brief summary to tempt you in…

What more could you ask for???

 

Post Title - just click to access the post

Inspired by

The basic message

 

Musical interlude

 

Gavin Bryers

To soothe our souls

Scepticism and moral panic

courageous posts from a fellow-blogger

Newspaper headlines about Covid19 need to factor in deaths from normal flu; economic lockdown could be counterproductive

Critical Masses, naked Emperors and freebies

a question left hanging in a previous post

 

What happens when groupthink takes over – a popular post this one

Visual and other Links I Liked

images and spectacle - the weekly roundup

John Berger, Guy Debord and George Galloway (and an amazing mag resource) all figure in this whimsical collection

Back in the saddle

 

PC issue causes blog silence for a few weeks

Some important Covid19 analyses

Links I liked

 

A book explores a century of foretelling the end of capitalism; Bregman’s “Humankind”; and intellectual history

We need to think more about what and why  we think

My Day

a (rare) video conference; and a tabular presentation of the structure of a book I’m drafting

How young and self-confident academics are these days

Learning to Learn

 

A video on the learning process takes me back to my memories of lecturing and training

A polyglot reveals her secrets

Journals worth reading updated

A desire to share goodies

Although newspapers are in deep trouble, small mags seem to be thriving

Links I liked

A richness of links

 

Podcasts and videos

A Challenge to Financial Thinking

Robert Skidelsky is pouring the books out!

Political economy is the only useful way to approach economics

Money Talks - why we need a new Vocabulary of social change

“Capital Rules OK” – why can’t we come up with an acceptable word for our condition – neoliberalism? The Beast? Minotaur?

Capitalism is undermining what’s left of democracy

revised blogroll

 

Recognising the few deep, consistent bloggers

It was a bit invidious to select only 6 blogs – all 50 are worth a look!

We need to talk about...the state

Long Pankaj Mishra article in LRB

Covid has demonstrated that only a few states are strategically governed

Who's having a good Covid19 War?

Some political scientists actually giving us useful assessments of government performance

Neoliberalism has stripped the state of its capacity

Covid19 as a warning shot

some Reflections/Lessons from the Future

We face extinction

Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Mapping the Common Ground

More in Common is an interesting Think Tank set up very recently with teams in France, Germany, the UK and the US. It's concerned to explore the 

“underlying drivers of fracturing and polarization - and to build more united, resilient and inclusive societies.  

 In its short life, it has commissioned a lot of survey work to try to understand what is going on in Europe and North America and issued a number of reports including, in April, this interim survey Hidden Tribes; Covid19, polarisation and the pandemic which, by September, produced these slides

This week, its British office produced a quite fascinating book-length report which I am still trying to read Britain’s Choice – common ground and divisions in 2020s Britain based on research it commissioned from the prime Yougov survey team.

The report suggests that Britain is not quite as polarised as we might think and can be divided into seven distinct groups - 

Progressive Activists: A powerful and vocal group for whom politics is at the core of their identity, and who seek to correct the historic marginalisation of groups based on their race, gender, sexuality, wealth and other forms of privilege. They are politicallyengaged, critical, opinionated, frustrated, cosmopolitan and environmentally conscious (13%).

 Civic Pragmatists: A group that cares about others, at home or abroad, and who are turned off by the divisiveness of politics. They are charitable, concerned, exhausted, community-minded, open to compromise, and socially liberal (13% of the total).

 – Disengaged Battlers: A group that feels that they are just keeping their heads above water, and who blame the system for its unfairness. They are tolerant, insecure, disillusioned, disconnected, overlooked, and socially liberal (12% of the total).

 Established Liberals: A group that has done well and means well towards others, but also sees a lot of good in the status quo. They are comfortable, privileged, cosmopolitan, trusting, confident, and pro-market (12%).

 Loyal Nationals: A group that is anxious about the threats facing Britain and facing themselves. They are proud, patriotic, tribal, protective, threatened, aggrieved, and frustrated about the gap between the haves and the have-nots (17% of the total).

Disengaged Traditionalists: A group that values a well-ordered society and prides in hard work, and wants strong leadership that keeps people in line. They are self-reliant, ordered, patriotic, toughminded, suspicious, and disconnected (18%).

Backbone Conservatives: A group who are proud of their country, optimistic about Britain’s future outside of Europe, and who keenly follow the news, mostly via traditional media sources. They are nostalgic, patriotic, stalwart, proud, secure, confident, and relatively engaged with politics (15%).

 The Britain we find in this study is not divided into two opposing camps. Britons come together in different formations depending on the issue at hand – 

much like the pieces of coloured glass in a kaleidoscope which cluster in different patterns as the instrument rotates.

This is a strength that may inoculate the UK against one of the most dangerous dimensions of polarisation, which experts describe as ‘conflict extension’ – when members of a group converge across a range of issues. Because the segments come together in different formations depending on the issue at hand, Britain is less likely to become divided as a society into two opposing camps.

– On issues of immigration and race, “Loyal Nationals”, “Disengaged Traditionalists”, and “Backbone Conservatives” come together, while “Progressive Activists”, “Civic Pragmatists”, “Disengaged Battlers”, and “Established Liberals” form another coalition.

 – On issues that involve social trust and institutions, we may see “Established Liberals”, “Civic Pragmatists” and “Backbone Conservatives” coming together on the one hand, while on the other hand “Disengaged Battlers”, “Disengaged Traditionalists” and “Progressive Activists” often align similarly because of their distrust of institutions.

– On issues of inequality and economic policy, Progressive Activists, Loyal Nationals, Civic Pragmatists, Disengaged Battlers, and to a lesser extent, Disengaged Traditionalists, are united.

 – There is widespread agreement on climate issues, led by a strong coalition of Progressive Activists, Civic Pragmatists, and Loyal Nationals.

I said, in the last post, that I was proud to be called a sceptic – but that is not the same as a “contrarian” of whom the sadly-missed Chris Hitchins was the most celebrated exemplar. I have, several times in this blog, bemoaned the failure of progressives to make common cause – or seek “common ground”. It remains an important concept for me

I need a separate post to explain the difference between these distinct aspects of strategic thinking….In the meantime, let me refer to another section of the report which pursues this theme …..

      We find common ground in Britain on many issues, with large majorities which:

– share a sense of national pride in many similar things – such as the NHS, our countryside, and our volunteer tradition

 – feel proud of Britain’s progress on gender equality and becoming a more tolerant and diverse nation – are committed to gender equality and racial equity

– believe that as a society we need to focus on responsibilities as much as rights

 – believe in closing the unfair gap between the haves and have-nots, and making sure that the hard work of key workers and others is better rewarded – want Britain to protect our countryside and lead on climate change

– believe we should strike a balance on difficult issues such as immigration

– feel decision making is too centralised in London

– want political leaders to compromise rather than just sticking to their positions and fighting. 

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Perennials

This blog, says the masthead, has set its face against 

 offering comments on current affairs. It rather uses incidents, books (old and new), links and papers to offer musings about our social endeavours. So old posts are as good as new!” 

But these are “Manichean” days – when people expect you to favour one of two sides; and, indeed, to nail your colours to the mast. And this I refuse to do – since I belong to the generation which grew up on Bertrand Russell - whose “Sceptical Essays” opens with an essay on “The Value of Scepticism” which puts in shade a lot of current discussions about “fake news”. And it was written almost a hundred years ago……. 

Although I was very active politically for some 25 years, my values were mainstream and I readily own up to being a bit of a “mugwump” who sees several sides to any story - and is open to new ideas. Just a few weeks ago, I found myself quoting this Russian proverb – 

“Don’t fear your friends - because they can only betray you.

Don’t fear your enemies – because they can only destroy you

But fear the indifferent – because it’s they who allow your friends to betray you and your enemies to destroy you” 

But under no circumstance should we confuse the “indifferent” with the sceptical!!

-      The indifferent are simply those who don’t care - they shrug their shoulders and “pass by on the other side”.

-      The sceptics, on the other hand, care deeply – they are passionate searchers after truth and, like Voltaire, will defend your right to your hallenge to what JK Galbraith called “the conventional wisdom” 

I would like to think my posts are as much “perennial” as open-minded and sceptical. Just click a title to access a post! 

 The 2020 posts - continued

Post title

What sparked it off

 

Its basic message

Explaining the blog’s title

 

Realising that I had never given a proper explanation of the changes in the blog’s name

Quite an important personal statement about the importance of trespassing – and how long I’ve felt this

No Man’s Land

 

This title was too warlike

 why straddling boundaries gives insights

Should I buy this book?

Applying the test I have developed for non-fiction books to a book which caught my eye.

Authors and publishers really do need to understand we are fed up with the flood of books they inflict on us

In praise of the Outsider

Wondering if straddling different worlds, however uncomfortable, doesn’t help challenge groupthink

There are some very-well written books out there about the operation of our economic system – but you have to know how to find them

We are all Pirates now!

 

Updating my list of journals worth reading

Ditto for journals

Writing Again

Starting with a great find from 1983 about how to write well and a 1944 book on the same topic

I confess I have a hidden folder on the art of writing

Does being an outsider help original writing?

Trying to pursue this hypothesis

It helps open one’s eyes – but then sheer discipline needed

How to write well

 

Summary of a marvellous essay from a man who changed into a woman a couple of decades later -

Imagine a reader – ensure paras have points – check each word – reread, reread, tighten – be concrete and plain

Reading Tips on better writing

Gathering the best references in one place

Practice, practice – and use appropriate tools like this table

Breakdown and Crises

 

The first of 7 well-written books dealing with a sense of humanity at the crossroads

David Runciman’s book is a stunning example of good writing

Gods and the rest of us superfluous people

Harari’s “Homo Deus – a history of tomorrow”

He may be too much the techno-optimist

Links I Liked

 

Starting with Coronavirus, then painting and ending with a couple of new series

As always some great hyperlinks

Facing Extinction?

 

 A post from a survivalist

The apocalypticists may have a point!

Coronavirus - who do we believe?

The urge to select and disseminate the clearest

The most helpful advice is not from government sources

Links I Liked

 

A model book review; Adam Curtis; survivalist blogs

The need for straight talking

Voice in the wilderness

 

Discovering a German pulmonological/.political sceptic

The importance of scepticism and peripheral vision

Music from my travels

Rediscovering CDs

 

I need to honour tonality more than textuality

Links which appealed in Ploiesti

Appalling TV programme selection; intellectual history; accounts of lockdowns

At times such as these we need sensitivity and honesty

Thought for the Day

A good quote from William Davies

This could be a paradigm change

 

On Perspective

About how mundane our prior passions now look

Useful to look back and see how we were dealing with the pandemic in its early stages

 Bach Cello Concertos - I'm sure Radio Muzical said the Cello Concerto I heard an hour or so ago was the "Seventh" - but there are apparently only 6 all of which you can view here