For 17 years I was allowed
to call myself a “lecturer” which I could have included in my Sceptic’s
Glossary as “someone who spouts words”. It was patently a higher status (and
rewarded) job than “teacher” who is expected to work with pupils (with at least
a year’s full-time training for that task) and to produce results (however
questionably measured).
In the 1970s a Lecturer
had a lot of freedom – in terms of both choice and scale of holidays (3 months’
summer vacation for example)
Initially, I enjoyed that
freedom…..although not so much with engineering students who took an
understandably dubious attitude to the “liberal studies” programme in which I
was initially employed - beautifully skewered in the Wilt series of novels by Tom Sharpe.
The work I particularly
enjoyed was that with “mature students” - whether at the “adult education”
classes of the Workers’ Educational Association; or in the Open University
where I was a part-time tutor in its opening period….
In the 1970s, planning
students at the famous Glasgow School of Art also proved to be a captive
audience for musings about my practical experience as a reforming politician in
a bureaucracy. Those were the days of Norman Dennis…..
I may not have helped them
in their examinations – but at least I gave them a foretaste (and forewarning)
of the games they would face in their future careers.
But my enjoyment faded as the
academic Degree Machine cranked up its requirements and I found myself suddenly
having to prepare course structures into which lectures and seminars fitted logically
and seamlessly – without any special help being on offer. It was simply assumed
that, having learned my subject, I would have the relevant skills to design
course programmes, deliver lectures and organise seminars to ensure that students
would read the relevant material and get through examinations successfully.
It took universities until
the 1990s to wake up and make sure that lecturers were properly trained in
these skills.
I had been winging my way
for too long to be able to submit to the new requirements; got utterly
depressed; and, after 3 years of winter misery, resigned in 1985….
Clearly, most teachers
know how to teach kids – although I don’t quite know where the balance of
argument currently lies between those who advocate “top-down” learning and
those who favour a child-centred approach.
But adult learners clearly
need a different approach – one that
helps them discover things for themselves…as is expressed so well in this
video – “10 things
polyglots do differently”.
It was 2005 before I got the opportunity to
learn about the very different world of training adults – first in Kyrgyzstan
where I was leader for two years of an EC-funded programme of capacity
development for local government; and then in Bulgaria where I also led a
programme to help prepare regional staff to comply with the requirements of EU
membership.
I learned a lot from both
experiences – starting with an intensive attempt to understand the needs of
those in charge of the new municipalities of the small central Asian state and
to provide relevant support. One of the results was this Roadmap
for Local Government in Kyrgyzstan which I very much enjoyed preparing – as you will see from the
way I pulled out the metaphor in the title (see the diagram at pages 76-77)
And I was able to use that
in the very next project – benefitting from the insights of a Polish trainer in
my team to produce one of my best papers - Training
that works! How do we build training systems which actually improve the
performance of state bodies?
So who says you can’t
teach an old dog new tricks??
No comments:
Post a Comment