Let me try to summarise what I have been trying to say in the various posts I’ve written this year about subjects such as good governance, anti-corruption and helping people help themselves…..
-
“Good governance” is an important concept
-
which has suffered from its patronising origins viz wanting to tell others what to do
-
and from the domination of the anti-corruption field
by economists and political scientists
-
Most anti-corruption strategies are not worth the
paper they are written on. Most AC Boards are sinecures used to hide real
misdeeds
-
Every country needs to take more seriously the question of how government can work better
for its citizens
-
It is the sort of subject which could be tackled
by a Citizen’s Jury – but only after municipalities have satisfactorily demonstrated
the potential of that device.
-
Until that happens, social scientists and others should be cooperating in each country to
summarise the various reports on improving the style and machinery of
government already produced and to formulate practical propositions which could
be used in such initiatives
-
On the basis, however, that only a consensual approach can help break down the high level of
distrust which exists everywhere about government. Unilateral, top-down injunctions don’t work…
-
Accountability, effective public bodies, rule of
law and transparency are not exactly the
sort of words and phrases calculated to inspire people
- The approach to change needs to be “sexier”
And
I’m not sure if “Happiness” is the silver bullet. I’ve just finished reading a
little Pelican book “Can
We Be Happier? Evidence and Ethics” by Richard Layard (2020) who was New Labour’s
Happiness Tsar (clicking the title will give you a good summary by the author).
I enjoyed the book – although others
were deeply sceptical.
It
is NOT one of these self-help books but very much directed at the sort of policy-makers
who were persuaded in the early part of the millennium that the
measurement of social progress needed to go beyond reliance on growth rates.
Joseph Stiglitz has been one of the key figures in this development. Various
countries – including Bhutan, New Zealand and Scotland have been sufficiently
persuaded to set up special programmes…although “wellbeing” is often the word
used rather than “happiness”
One of the interesting features of Layard’s book is that half of it consists of a consideration of how its basic message might be applied by a range of people – including health professionals, teachers, communities, scientists, economists, politicians and public servants. I was sad to see that the section on politicians and public managers contains none of the references I might have expected to see on the good government literature eg Bo Rothstein or Merilee Grindle particularly when the final chapter of Rothstein’s Good Government – the relevance of political science (2012) strongly argues that better government makes people happier
No comments:
Post a Comment