“Capitalism”…I
started, but the barman hopped out of a pipkin
“Capitalism”,
he countered…”That’s a flat and frothless word
I’m
a good Labour man, but if I mentioned capitalism
My
clientele would chew off their own ears
And
spit them down the barmaid’s publicised cleavage”
“All
right” I obliged “Don’t call it capitalism
Let’s
call it Mattiboko the Mighty
……..
The
poem finishes…
This
was my fearless statement
“The
Horror World can only be changed by the destruction of
Mattiboko
the Mighty,
The
Massimataxis Incoporated Supplement
And
Gumbo Jumbo the Homely Obblestrog Spectacular”
Audience
Reaction was quite encouraging
Almost a quarter of my blogposts last year wrestled with various aspects of the economic system which now looks set to destroy the planet.
In my youth, the nuclear
threat was what kept us awake at night – and that was particularly the case for
those of us who lived a mere couple of kilometres from the US nuclear submarine
base on the Clyde. Many thought that the collapse of the Berlin Wall had ended
such existential fear - but global warming has now taken its place.
The year started with a
couple of posts about important books with “capitalism“ in their title before
trying to make amends for the failure of the blog to dealt properly with the
ecological issue.
It was, however, Paul
Collier’s “The Future of Capitalism –
facing the new anxieties” which really got me scribbling last year – initially with a
series of posts which reminded me that I had still not managed to complete a
book which has occupying me for several years.
Writing a book about a
subject you don’t understand is an activity I’ve recommended for everyone to
help dispel the confusions we all have (if we’re honest enough)…More
challenging is when the topic proves to be more amorphous - and changes shape
as you work on it. Such has been my experience with text I started almost 20
years ago
– long before the financial crash of 2008…It started with a critique that went
as follows –
- Consumerism is killing the planet – and making
people miserable.
- The poor are getting poorer
- political culture is getting ever more
centralised (notwithstanding Scottish devolution).
- Social democrats like New Labour have sold the
state to corporate interests.
- don’t blame individuals such as Tony Blair –
it’s in the nature of modern politics. Note the political corruption in Italy,
Belgium, Germany, France and even Britain.
- The EU is selfish and lacks vision
The paper then looked at
the organisations and people I
admired; what they were achieving; where they seemed to be failing and why; and went on to raise the question of how
someone of my age, experience and resources might better contribute to society.
Many, of course, will
scorn such an aspiration – seeing it as typical of a western “do-gooder”…
I readily admit my natural
inclination to intervene in social processes (ie my “activist” mode) and that a
lot of the recent writing on “chaos theory” and even “systems theory” seems to
me to run the risk of encouraging fatalism – one of the four world views Mary
Douglas
introduced us to and which Chris Hood’s The Art of the State (1999) analyses so
brilliantly
The world is getting
increasingly complex these days – so it’s hardly surprising that we
increasingly hear the argument for “leaving well alone” (or “laisser-faire” as
it used to be called). But we do need to look carefully at who makes - and
indeed funds - such arguments. They are the right-wing US Foundations funded by
such billionaires as the Koch brothers..
One of my favourite
writers - AO Hirschmann – actually devoted an entire book (”The Rhetoric of Reaction”; 1991) to
examining three arguments conservative writers use for dismissing the
hopes of social reformers:
-
The futility thesis argues that attempts at social
transformation will be unavailing, that they will simply fail to “make a dent.”
-
the perversity thesis holds that any purposive action to improve
some feature of the political, social, or economic order only serves
to exacerbate the condition one wishes to remedy.
-
the jeopardy thesis argues that the cost of the proposed change
or reform is too high as it endangers some previous, precious
accomplishment.
Have a look at any
argument against a proposed reform - you will find it a variant of these three.
But such fatalism offends my sense of what we used to call “free will” (and now
“agency theory”). Powerful people exist – whether in corporations,
international agencies or governments – who can and do influence events. Our
job as citizens is to watch them carefully and protest when we can..
In the 1930s it was not
difficult to identify the enemy…Today the enemy is a more voracious and complex
system which we variously call “globalisation” or “neoliberalism” and only more
recently “capitalism” - whose disastrous consequences the activists of Porto
Allegro had exposed……although it took the crash of 2008 to prove the point…
Yanis Varoufakis used the
highly appropriate term “the Global Minotaur” for his brilliant 2011
story of how surplus capital had sought its rewards – with all the
destructiveness that Joseph Schumpeter had first described in Capitalism, Socialism and
Democracy
(1942) – but minus the “creativity”
The Minotaur not only
survived but managed the amazing trick of transferring bank losses onto state
exchequers and bringing on austerity and further vilification of the state…It
was the poisoning of the state I first noticed – thanks to George Monbiot’s The Captive State – the
corporate takeover of Britain (2000) and started to blog about in 2009. But
within a few years such a critique of the political class had become
commonplace.
So, to tempt you into flicking
through “To Whom it may Concern” (for which just click the title in the list at
the top-right corner of the blog masthead) here is a table with a selection of
relevant posts with brief explanations…
Selected Posts about the Beast
Post
|
What sparked it
off
|
Why it’s worth
reading
|
|
Wolfgang Streeck’s “The End of
Capitalism?”
|
Has hyperlinks which cut to the core
of the discussion
|
|
“Club of Rome” report
“Come on! Capitalism”
|
It’s a definitive report and my post
tries to summarise other key texts about the turning point the world seems to
have reached
|
|
An article in NYRB about the
ecological disaster we face
|
Exhaustive reading list
|
|
Pelican book sparks off an Old
Labourist reflections
|
The post puts the present concerns
in an historical context
|
|
Finding an internet version of a
political economy book I had read in 2012
|
The book is one of the best
explanations of the financial crash…
but now reread as if for the first
time
|
|
Finding an internet version of a
little-known but superbly-written economics textbook
|
May have been produced 21 years ago
but clearly written by someone very sensitive to readers’ needs
|
Paul Collier’s new book
|
Explains why the book was so good it
inspired 5 posts
|
|
Which failed to explore this
underlying theme
|
An agenda is sketched out
|
|
Are we no longer masters of our
fate?
|
Some good reviews are summarised
|
|
The future of capitalism
part IV
|
Acknowledgements page reminds me how
important friends are to drafting process
|
As well as some critiques
|
The Beast needs fixed!
Part V
|
A final assessment of Collier – with
some suggestions for further reading
|
No comments:
Post a Comment