Most people ignore most
poetry
Because
Most poetry ignores most
people
Adrian Mitchell was the
author of the poem whose title I borrowed for the collection of this past
year’s blogposts – and this is the inscription at the beginning of the book of
his collected poetry…..
My posts may tend to be on
the long side - but this is not for want of trying to cut to the chase. Oscar
Wilde’s retort that “the best way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it”
is a lovely example of the focused epigrammatic approach which was such a
feature of Clive James’ writing.
I have decided views about writing genres – with a rather strong
preference for essays (and short stories). I sometimes wonder whether my lack of
interest in fiction betrays an element
of autism – although in 2010 I did an
interesting list of the novels which had appealed to me in the previous
decade.
But a couple of years ago
I went so far as to suggest that the flood of books had reached such a point
that we needed to consider rationing
at least non-fiction books
Given the popularity of Twitter
and the fear that our attention span is declining, one might have imagined that
poetry might appeal to the younger generation. But I don’t sense any sign of
this…
When then is it that so few poets appeal to us? I have a few
favourites - Bertolt Brecht, Norman MacCaig, TS Eliot, WS Graham, Charles
Bukowski, Marin Sorescu and Adrian Mitchell. What is it about such poets which allows
them to “reach parts other cannot reach”?
In Bukowski’s case the
answer is obvious – he wrote about low-class life in a bawdy way and
made not the slightest concession to the poetic structure. It seemed like a flow
of semi-consciousness….
Norman MacCaig and Marin
Sorescu – from opposite ends of Europe – shared a wry, humanist approach
to nature and events. See MacCaig’s “Smuggler” and Sorescu’s “Asking too Much?” - the latter about a man commuting between Heaven and Hell and unable to choose between a book, a bottle of wine and a woman
My favourite poem is
probably Brecht’s “In Praise
of Doubt” which you can find in this collected
edition of Brecht’s poetry.
WS Graham and TS Eliot were
pretty apolitical but I have always been fond of TS Eliot’s Four Quartets not only for its Zen like
sense of time and the puniness of our efforts but for its references to the
fragile nature of words – thus, in “Burnt Norton”
Words strain,
Crack and sometimes break,
under the burden,
Under the tension, slip,
slide, perish,
decay with imprecision,
will not stay in place
So here I am, in the
middle way, having had twenty years
Trying to learn to use
words, and every attempt
Is a wholly new start, and
a different kind of failure
Because one has only
learnt to get the better of words
Little wonder, therefore,
that Eliot was a great admirer of a little-known poet from my home town
(Greenock) in the 1940s, WS Graham who also wrote a lot about words eg
Speaking is difficult and
one tries
To be exact, and yet not
to
Exact the prime intention
to death.
On the other hand, the
appearance of things
Must not be made to mean
another
thing. It is a kind of
triumph
To see them and to put
them down
As what they are. The
inadequacy
Of the living, animal
language drives
Us all to metaphor and an
attempt
To organise the spaces we
think
We have made occur between
the words.
Update; when the post first appeared, I quite unforgivably omitted Tom Leonard from
the list. He died, sadly, in February 2019, but his website richness is still available
and the letters in particular give a true sense of Glaswegian literary life.
His most famous poems were in contemporary street Scots – my favourite being “The
Six o’clock News” which you will find my scrolling down this
excellent extended tribute
No comments:
Post a Comment