1. Heads or Hands?
It’s interesting that we
should get 2 new books in a single month challenging
one of the basic principles of our times – namely meritocracy.
That they should appear just as
we began to notice the paradox of the “essential workers” (nurses, dustbin-men)
earning a pittance whilst the “symbolic analysts” (in Reich’s famous phrase) sit
on their backsides and rake in millions is nothing short of prescient.
The Tyranny
of Merit – what’s become of the common good? is philosopher Michael
Sandel’s attack on the principle which, he argues, has led to hubris amongst the victors and
humiliation amongst the losers. In 2009 Sandel delivered the prestigious BBC
Reith Lecture for that year – on “Markets and Morals”
In his just-published Head, Hand, Heart – the struggle for
dignity and status in the 21st Century, Goodhart dares to question the emphasis
on the importance of university education which became such a shibboleth in the
1970s….- unlike the more sensible Germany….who have always prized and honoured
practical skills and had a strong vocational training tradition.
I
have this past week been working on an article about the Sofia street protests for a guest post the first part of which will
appear tomorrow (Tuesday) on Boffy’s
Blog - and then on this one.
The
article asks what progress central and
eastern Europe has or has not made in the past 30 years…starting with a quote
from a famous little book “Reflections
on the Revolution in Europe” written in 1990 by the anglo-german academic
and liberal statesman, Ralf Dahrendorf
– to the effect that the development of
effective civil society would take 2 generations (viz 50 years)
Dahrendorf was a brilliant Anglo-German intellectual who, more than 30 years before his “Revolution in Europe”, had written a revisionist take on “Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society” (1959 Eng trans) with which I was very taken just as I was starting my political sociology course.
A few years later he wrote a highly provocative analysis of his country - Society and Democracy in Germany (1967 Eng trans) – which argued that Germany could only then be called a “modern” society…..Nazism had at last broken the deference to authority which had until then been the country’s defining feature - this a mere 2 decades after Germany’s “Stunde Null”. The book caused quite a controversy both within and outside Germany. Geoffrey Eley was one British historian who disputed the analysis and went on to write an entire book about The Peculiarities of German History (1984)
In
the 1960s it was France and its planning system that many of us admired….it
took another decade before we realised that the German Federal and training systems
and worker representation on Boards were healthy features worth studying more
closely.
It’s difficult to remember
that the UK was the object of universal admiration if not envy – whereas it is
now seen as a bit of a Banana Republic. Just look at the latest post on Chris Gray’s
Brexit Blog – the descent
into political insanity
I
suppose one lesson is that all fortunes fall and rise – no one should ever give
up hope on their country?
The
idea of Citizen Assemblies has always impressed me – this
article gives some recent examples.
It
was Robert Michels’ Political
Parties – a sociological study of the oligarchic tendencies of modern democracy
(1911) which had alerted me in the 1960s to the insidious slide of political
leadership - and made me so sympathetic to the German Greens attempts to
control its leadership.
After
the recent UK and US experience of political leadership – which has allowed
so-called leaders to run amok, I am at last persuaded that we do need to look
seriously at this idea. We could start with this article….
No comments:
Post a Comment