I have known for a long
time about the importance of taking a critical approach to one’s own writing - of
reading it back as if I was a reader. This helps me not only to find easier
ways to say what I mean but also to identify imprecisions and ambiguities…
And whenever I notice that
the argument in a text of mine has moved on, whether to another aspect of the
same theme or to a new theme, I will tend to mark that change by starting a new
paragraph (at the very least) or by inserting a heading – no matter how small.
This makes the text easier to read….
But it is the tables I
started to use in the blog a year or so ago which are now proving to a powerful
tool in the editing the book which I have been trying to finish for the past 20
years…To the extent that I now realise that the focus of the book is not quite what I thought it was.
Initially the book carried
the title “Ways of Seeing…the global Crisis” but, some years ago, that changed
to “Dispatches to the Future Generation” to convey first the fact that it was
structured from blogposts (like “letters”); and, second, the sense that it was
the giving of one generation’s account of its “stewardship” of the world (or
lack of it) to the next generation (my daughters’)
But, as far as I was
concerned, the core of the book was its commentary on the various books written
about the global economic crisis…
In the past week, however,
I have been adding various posts from the archives which, intuitively, seemed
appropriate eg the recent series
on the UK power structure, old ones about
political roles (which had identified four very distinctive group loyalties
or “constituencies” between whom politicians generally have to choose); thinking
institutionally; and a conservative philosopher’s musings on the
New Left. These, patently, had nothing to do with economics and yet my
unconscious clearly saw them as significant. They joined some other
commentaries already in the draft which had more to do with social values; and
also a significant one about
intellectual timelines….And means that the draft has broken through the 200
page barrier..
I was already aware that
my draft said very little about the ecological crisis (surely, I argued, it’s
all been said?) but that, equally, it focused very much on the reactions of the
privileged world. So I am now experimenting with the title “Notes on a Western Crisis”
No comments:
Post a Comment