Performance
management and measurement was all the rage a few years ago but a series of
academic critiques (of which Paradoxes of Modernity – unintended consequences of public policy reform
(2012) is one of the latest examples) seemed set to dampen enthusiasms. But the
benefits which the mantra of performance (if not "name and shame" regimes) seem to offer
to governments desperately looking for quick fixes look irresistible…and the
peddlars of performance movement medicines continue to do well.
I
spent a long and arduous weekend helping to draft a project submission for EU
Structural Funds aimed at helping a SE European country rejig its “governance”
system. It had me spitting blood and regretting that no one seems able to
critique the nonsenses which seem to be perpetrated on people by these Funds. A
few years back I did a long critique of the multi-billion EC Technical Assistance
programme. I called it The
Long Game – not the LogFrame
In
just 5 months (!!), this particular project is expected to –
- Summarise
“all research” which has been undertaken on “good governance” (there are
thousands)
- Draft
a White Paper on the subject
- Draft
a methodology for designing a rating system for innovation in state bodies
I
readily confess that I have “form” in such issues. In 2002 I drafted a Manual
on “good policy analysis” for Slovak civil servants; in 2005 I accepted World
Bank and UNDP largesse to write papers on Public Administration Reform (PAR) in
Azerbaijan; in 2007/8 I drafted a Road
Map for local government in Kyrgyzstan
My
bookshelves groan under the weight of books containing rhetoric, descriptions
and assessments of the experience of what, in the 80s and 90s, was called
“public administration reform” but is now called “good governance”.
Whenever
the terms change in this way, we need to ask Why…..what’s going on? Does this
hide a guilty secret somewhere?
Perhaps
the very confidence with which we now use terms like “transparency” and
“accountability” masks our fear that we haven’t a clue – that we know less
today about running our public affairs than we (thought we) knew in 1984??
Or
perhaps that’s not quite true…. 30 years has presumably given us the
opportunity to do what all good scientists are supposed to do – to “disprove”.
At least (surely) we now know what doesn’t work….or at least what doesn’t work
under certain conditions/in certain contexts?
And
(whisper it quietly) South-Eastern contexts are different from North Western ones!!
I
did some googling to see what the literature on such topics as “performance”
and “good governance” is like these days. Sure enough it no longer seems the “hot”
topic it was a decade ago. But it seems that what has happened is that the snake
oil which is no longer acceptable in the old member countries is now being
peddled in the new markets of central and south-east Europe!
No comments:
Post a Comment