I
had a colleague who could always be relied upon to calm a crisis – “we are
where we are” he would say philosophically. It reminded me of a favourite
phrase of mine - “man ist was man isst” – apparently “we are what we are” but
the Germans are actually saying “we are what we eat”.
What
is it about “ists”….? Feminists, individualists, socialists, atheists,
royalists….fascists… You can literally hear the spit of disapproval if not
outright abuse….The words are insults – hurled at people who are seen to be
….extrem…ists…advocating an extreme position.
When
the referendum campaign about Scottish independence began – all of 2 years ago
– the discourse was civilised – the terms “separatist” and “unionist” were
avoided. A “unionist” for us in Scotland was a “royalist” – someone who saluted
the flag…living out the last of his years in a bungalow in the south of England
or in Northern Ireland.
About
6 months ago, on one of the rare occasions when I joined a discussion thread, I
was roundly ticked off for using the term “separatist”. The rebuke was well deserved…..the
millions of Scots who have in the past few decades become so disillusioned with
the behaviour of British Governments are not extremists. Rather they have been
given a rare opportunity by the referendum to take part in the sort of
“Conversation” (and search for a new public philosophy) recommended in the
tantalising conclusion of David Marquand’s recent book “Mammon’s Kingdom – an Essay on Britain, Now . And they are taking full
advantage of that opportunity…..
Having
said that, let us not be caught up in political correctness. What Scotland
faces is “separation”. There’s nothing unusual about such a process – it
happens to millions of people and quite a few countries. It’s usually painful –
but many who have undergone the process of separation will testify that they
feel so much better…..So why beat about the bush?
I
find myself engaging in this semantic musing simply because I’m now trying to
give a title to the little E-book I’m producing from my 40 odd blogposts on the
Scottish debate. At first I thought of “The Scottish Debate – home
thoughts from abroad” but, as I drafted the “Preface”, I found myself writing
this sentence
“The booklet is simply a record of the reverbations of the debate which has reached someone who loves Scotland but who has been absent for 24 years.At the best of times, we hear what we want to hear; and, in my case, I am hearing the debate via the internet….with echoes from the memory chamber of the 1970s and 1980s”.
So
I tried out “Reverbations” as a title – but it doesn’t make much sense.
But,
as I was waking up this morning, the
word “Separating” came to me….Not a noun – an adjective. Not a term of abuse
but a description of a fact….
So
sorry, I think we’ve reached the stage we need to call a spade a spade…..
I
googled the phrase and came across a couple of other essays on the issue – what is separatism? and in praise of separatism
Also
a discussion between two Scots
No comments:
Post a Comment