I have been
reading a provocative book about “development” which came out recently and
whose very title gives a flavour of its thesis - The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the
Forgotten Rights of the Poor (the link gives the full
text!).
From its
many reviews, it has already created quite a furore in the extensive community
which has been earning its (considerable) living from advising poorer countries
for the past 50-60 years.
I found myself engaged in a bit of a confessional
when I tried to put down my initial thoughts about the book’s thesis. This post
explains why - the next post will try to summarise the book’s content and the
arguments it has produced.
“Development
consultancy” is a term used for people funded by international agencies who fly
into countries which have been designated as “underdeveloped” and write reports
and implement programmes designed to increase their social and economic
wellbeing….(that of the hosts that is (!) Sadly the reality has generally proved disappointing and had, by
the 80s attracted a considerable backlash led by the likes of PD Bauer.
Some 20
years ago I penned a small autobiographical book entitled “Puzzling Development” marking that change of role – a book whose
cover carried the famous 1871 painting “The
Geographer”
by Henri de Braekeleer and whose subtitle was “Odyssey of a Modern Candide” – a theme which has run though quite a
few of my scribbles since the 70s.
The introduction promises to cover issues relating to bureaucratic, urban and policy change; public involvement; privatisation; and technical assistance and covered experience of four countries
The introduction promises to cover issues relating to bureaucratic, urban and policy change; public involvement; privatisation; and technical assistance and covered experience of four countries
In 1977 I had produced my first little book – “The Search for Democracy” whose cover showed community activists poring over a map and, I noticed yesterday for the first time in 25 or so years, a puzzled little boy cut out from the main group and standing alone at the side…….my alter ego and hero no less - Hans Christian Anderson’s creation who dared utter the magic words “but the Emperor has no clothes!!). Its sub-title had been “a guide to and polemic about Scottish local government” and it tried to answer 43 questions which people I worked with would ask me
Was it
significant that the cover of my later and most rigorous book - In Transit – notes
on good governance
(1999) – written as a calling card for the younger generation I was by then
working with in ex-communist countries - showed simply a rock on an Atlantic
beach with the geological strata starkly revealed by the ocean’s
pounding…..???? Had I even then become fatalistic about human endeavour???
But “revenons aux moutons” as the French say…..the author of The Tyranny of Experts is an American guy called William Easterly who published an earlier book in 2006 with the equally provocative title - The White Man’s Burden – why the west’s efforts to aid the rest of the world have done so much ill and so little good.
Easterly,
clearly, is a sceptic – but scepticism is a
feature I value – have a look at my Sceptic’s Glossary if you don’t believe me.
It’s actually called “Just
Words - a glossary and bibliography for the fight against the
pretensions and perversities of power”
Sceptics
challenge what JK Galbraith wonderfully called “the conventional wisdom” and,
providing they actually embody the spirit of sceptical inquiry, are a necessary
and critical element in any intellectual journey….I add the qualification
simply because quite a few contrarians do have an agenda (generally a
libertarian one).
We have an
ambivalent attitude to “experts” – even medical ones – conceding that engineers
and surgeons deserve our respect but rightly questioning the “expertise” of
many experts in the field of social sciences….particularly those employed by
powerful international bureaucracies which certainly have agendas of their
own…..
But it is
the development economists that Easterly has it in for……who seduce the powerful
with talk of the wealth and progress which will come if only they follow their
advice….
I found the
opening section of the book very worthwhile because –
- it gives a
rare insight into the start of the discipline of development economics; some of
its key figures and arguments; and its “divorce” from mainstream economics
- it questions
the focus on the nation, reminding us that the infrastructure of economics is
based (questionably for many of us) on the “rationality” of the individual
consumer and (small) company
- it reminds
us of how important to the development of capitalism was the challenge to power
of the spirit of liberty
As it
happens, my University course developed an interest for me in the space between the nation and the
individual company – and how its operations might be improved ie regional,
urban and, latterly, community development.
And one of
the people whose writings made a big impression on me (some ten years later) was
Ivan
Illich whose challenge to the power of health and educational professionals
was a breath of fresh air for me and profoundly influenced the community power element of Strathclyde Region’s
Social Strategy for the Eighties which I helped shape.
Illich was,
of course, your quintessential anarchist – distrusting the sort of
well-intentioned power held by those of us who managed a social strategy which
went on to shape the strategies of the system of the Scottish governments which
have held power in the past 15 years……But governments have to select priorities
for both their attention and funding. With some hesitation we did designate
what we called in the late 1970s “areas of priority treatment” - initially 45
of them whose inhabitants’ lives we tried to assist with the help of community
structures led by community activists assisted by development workers….
I doubt
whether we got the balance right between community, professional and political
power – and subsequent events demonstrated how easily economic power caps
everything……But at least we tried
The question
for readers of Easterly’s book is how well he deals with those different faces
of power……….
The cartoon is by a brilliant Romanian - Bogdan Petry - whose exhibition we saw this week in the Campulung gallery. His savage work is on a par with the great Ralph Steadman......
The cartoon is by a brilliant Romanian - Bogdan Petry - whose exhibition we saw this week in the Campulung gallery. His savage work is on a par with the great Ralph Steadman......