One of the most thoughful and well-read bloggers is Aurelien whose latest post is an annotated list of the books which have helped him develop his particular world view which, sadly, he makes no attempt to describe. But it’s clear that he’s a bit of a contrarian – rubbishing mainstream literature and clearly enjoying, as I do, the writings of people such as Richard Evans and EP Thompson whose 1978 “The Poverty of Theory and other Essays” I downloaded as a result of the mention. I would strongly recommend reading Aurelien’s post in full - its book references reflect a life of reading and are quite fascinating.
I recently posted about my response to a challenge thrown down by the Cultural Tutor to identify the book which everyone should read. That, of course, is not quite the same as listing the books which helped form your world view. But for what it’s worth, these are the books I mentioned for the challenge -
It’s not surprising that the books I remember are from the early 1960s – for example EH Carr was a favourite, not just his “Twenty Years’ Crisis” (1946) which introduced me to Realism but What is History? EH Carr (1961) which I vividly remember for its story of how you caught fish (facts) depended on the type of reel you used and the spot you chose to fish at.
Peter Berger was another writer who made an impact – first for his prescient postmodern analysis in The Socal construction of Reality P Berger and T Luckman (1966) and then Pyramids of Sacrifice – political ethics and social change (1975)
More recently, writers such as Francis Fukuyama, David Graeber, Michael Greer, Roman Krznaric, Kate Rawarth, Wolfgang Streeck and Yanis Varoufakis have also impressed . One book, however, stands out for the variety of explanations it offers for the difficulties we have in agreeing and acting on global warming – viz Why We Disagree about Climate Change by Mike Hulme (2009). But, at the end of the day, I tend to fall back on Bertrand Russell whose Sceptical essays still delight although published in 1925
Aurelien’s post has spurred me to do three things
to try to describe my own world view
to identify the books which helped form that
to see whether I could list some books which challenged that world view
My World View (WV) My WV is not static – I have become more radical in my old age. In my youth,
I was powerfully influenced by the likes of Karl Popper and Tony Crosland.
My initial experience of municipal government made the tactics of Saul Alinsky
attractive but then I became more of a liberal technocrat. The new millennium
saw the scales drop from my eyes and this is how I described the situation in
2014.
Political parties are a bust flush - All mainstream political parties in Europe have been affected by the neo-liberal virus and can no longer represent the concerns of ordinary people. And those “alternative parties” which survive the various hurdles placed in their way by the electoral process rarely survive.
The German Greens were an inspiration until they too eventually fell prey to the weaknesses of political parties identified a hundred years ago by Robert Michels.
More recently, “Pirate” parties in Scandinavia and Bepe Grillo’s Italian Five Star Movement have managed, briefly, to capture public attention, occupy parliamentary benches but then sink to oblivion or fringe if not freak interest.
What the media call “populist” parties of various sorts attract bursts of electoral support in most countries but are led by labile individuals preying on public fears and prejudices and incapable of the sort of cooperative effort which serious change requires.
NGOs are no match for corporate power - The annual World Social Forum has had more staying power than the various “Occupy movements” but its very diversity means that nothing coherent emerges to challenge the power elite whose “scriptures” are delivered from the pulpits of The World Bank and the OECD There doesn’t even seem a common word to describe our condition and a vision for a better future – “social change”? What’s that when it’s at home?
Academics are careerists – although the groves of academia are still sanctuary
for a few brave voices who speak out against the careless transfer by governments
of hundreds of billions of dollars to corporate interests …
Noam Chomsky and David Harvey are prominent examples.
Henry Mintzberg, one of the great management gurus, has in the last decade broken
ranks and now writes about the need for a profound “rebalancing” of the power structure
- Rebalancing Society – radical renewal beyond left, right and centre. Economists who challenge the conventional wisdom of that discipline are now able
to use the Real-World Economics blog.
Daniel Dorling is a geographer who focuses on inequalities eg his powerful
Injustice – why social inequality persists.
Think Tanks play safe – and….think - although there are honourable exceptions such as -
Susan George, a European activist and writer, who operates from the
Trans National Institute(TNI) and, amongst her many books, has produced twomarvellous satires – Lugano I and Lugano II
David Korton’s books and Yes Magazine keep up a steady critique.
Joseph Stiglitz, once part of the World Bank elite, writes scathingly about
economic conventional wisdom.
The Pope has the resources of the Vatican behind him; and is proving a great
example in the struggle for dignity and against privilege.
No comments:
Post a Comment