I've just finished "The Act of Living – what the great psychologists can teach us about surviving discomfort in an Age of Anxiety" by Frank Tallis (2021) which is a lovely overview of key figures in that discipline. It also gives me an opportunity to correct an interesting mistake I made a few years back when one of my famous tables - purporting to show how each of the social sciences tried to make sense of the world - completely forgot to include psychology. Some, indeed, might call the mistake “Freudian”!!
The core assumptions of academic subjects (amended table)
Discipline |
Core assumption |
Most Famous exponents (not necessarily typical!) |
Anthropology |
shared meaning |
B Malinowski, Evans-Pritchard, Claude Levi-Strauss, Margaret Mead, Mary Douglas, Chris Shore, David Graeber |
Economics |
Rational choice |
Adam Smith, J Schumpeter, JM Keynes, P Samuelson, M Friedmann, J Stiglitz, Thomas Pikety, Ho-Joon Chang |
Geography |
the interaction of physical and cultural influences |
Alexander von Humboldt, H Mackinder, David Harvey, Danny Dorling |
Political economy |
explores the role of political factors in economic outcomes. |
JK Galbraith, Susan Strange, Mark Blyth, Wolfgang Streeck, Geoffrey Hodgson, Yanis Varoufakis, |
Political science |
Rational choice (at least since the 1970s) |
Robert Dahl, Gabriel Almond, David Easton, S Wolin, Peter Hall, James Q Wilson, Bo Rothstein, Francis Fukuyama |
Psychology |
Maslow’s basic ones of survival |
Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Erich Fromm. Bruno Bettelheim, Maslow, Howard Gardner, |
Public management |
mixed for traditional bodies - rational choice for New PM |
Woodrow Wilson, Gerald Caiden, Chris Hood, Chris Pollitt, B Guy Peters, G Bouckaert, |
Sociology |
Struggle for power |
Durkheim, Max Weber, Talcott Parsons, C Wright Mills, Robert Merton, Herbert Simon, A Etzioni, Ralf Dahrendorf |
And, indeed, there is something in my Presbyterian soul which probably disapproves of the idea of someone doing a quasi-Confessional on another human being. The intercession of a priest (or psychologist) is somehow not right!
And, yet, I have read psychology books with some pleasure and, indeed, edification – I thoroughly enjoyed the wry humour of Michael Foley’s The Age of Absurdity – why modern life makes it hard to be happy (2010) and learned much from "Life and how to survive it" by Robin Skynner and John Cleese (1993) - one of the clearest expositions I know of how the different stages of human development - at individual, organisational and societal levels and still in print after some 30 years.
Such titles may focus on us as individuals rather than political creatures but I am a great believer in in the injunction to "Know Thyself”- if a bit slow in the actual practice. But psychological matters seem to have been pressing in on me recently – with posts last year such as Know Thyself, then one about the Johari Window and one actually entitled Mind Matters which brought together several books with a psychological perrspective
No comments:
Post a Comment