We use the concept of “change” all the time but there seems to be surprisingly little written about it as an all-embracing concept. The literature on change is, of course, immense but is divided very much into several completely separate fields which guard their boundaries very strongly - dealing with the individual, the organisational and the societal respectively (forgive the last term but “social” does have a rather different meaning from activities relating to a particular society). The first field tends to be interested in things like stress; the second in the management of change (but in 3 separate sectors); and the last in collective challenges to power which often go under the label of “social change”
Capacity development is one of the few approaches which recognises the importance of all three – although, in reality, its focus is on training and it never ventures into the dangerous field of social change. It’s only in the past year or so that people have dared challenge this (see last 2 titles in "networked" level of table)
As my few faithful readers
know, I have taken on this strange, Sisyphean task of
trying to make sense of the modern world. Each time I think I am close to
success, the stone breaks free and rolls back down the mountain – or rather I
realise either that the words don’t do justice to the reality or, more often,
that what I regarded as original thought is now the conventional wisdom. I
leave the text for a few months and then – masochist that I am – return to the
task. The latest
version of “What is to be Done?” has some marginal changes but I’m now keen
to improve the chapter which deals with Change.
Our understanding of that phenomenon generally comes from history books the most popular of which deal with individuals - who are easier to identify with. Talk of technological and economic forces tends to be too abstract for most people – although recent books from the likes of Jared Diamond and Yuval Hari are enjoying a new vogue by virtue presumably of our increased awareness of the power of technology.
The trouble is that
knowledge has, in the past half century, become so specialised that it is now
very difficult to explore Change in a truly inter-disciplinary way. That’s why
I’ve devoted the second chapter to the glories
of trespassing across boundaries – whether of class, nation, profession or intellectual
discipline.
This table tries to reduce a very complex field of writing to a few milestones.
The Level |
The Focus |
Example |
The individual |
Self-help, psychology |
In Over our Heads – the mental
demands of modern life Robert Kegan 1995 |
The organisational |
Commercial – managing change, OD |
In Search of
Excellence Peters and Waterman 1982 |
|
Public – new public management, public value |
Reinventing
Government Graeber and Osborne (1992) Appraising
public value; past, present and futures (2011) useful (academic) summary article Public Value Management – governance and reform in Britain ; John Connolly et al (2021) |
|
Non-governmental |
Creating
Public Value in Practice – advancing the common good in a ….noone in charge
world J Bryson and Crosby (2015) |
The societal |
Social change |
Can Democracy be Saved? -
participation, deliberation and social movements; Donatella Della Porta
(2013) Power in movement – social
movement and contentious politics; Sydney Tarrow (2011 edition) Change
the World Robert Quinn (2000) |
networked |
The dynamic between the 3
levels |
Life and How to
Survive it R Skynner and J Cleese 1990 The World We Create Tomas
Bjorkman 2019 Unlearn – a compass for
radical transformation Hans Burmeister (2021) |
No comments:
Post a Comment