When I had a high profile – as a change agent in Europe’s largest Region in the 1970s and 1980s – I would quite often receive invitations to join discussion/advisory groups or write articles for journals (generally one led to the other). One of the first came from the Tavistock Institute and was to join the Advisory Group for a 3 year project about Networks in which my Region was taking part in the late 1970s.
John Friend was the key player in the Institute of Operational Research which ran the project but Eric Trist and Fred Emery were big names associated with the systems thinking which lay behind the work. The planning theorist Andreas Faludi nicely situates here John Friend’s contribution to the planning field. An article I contributed to the Newsletter they ran gives a very good sense of the wider context in which the work was taking place - “Local government, learning and social change” (Linkage newsletter 3 of Institute of Operational Research (IOR) 1978)
Involvement with the Institute gave me a chance to look at my work using a different perspective or lens. Wherever
we are, we tend to get too used to our routines – and it helps to be jolted out
of that and get the chance to see things though different eyes…..(hence the title the blog has carried this past year or so)
In the 1980s, the invitations came increasingly from Europe and were focused on the processes and lessons of urban change. It was through a network with the acronym R.O.M.E that I met the indefatigable Riccardo Petrella who became a great campaigner against globalisation and for the importance of public water provision
My
role as an institutional development consultant from 1991 brought a reduced public
profile – although the European Centre
for Development Policy Management did invite me for discussions about my
local government work in Kyrgyzstan - when I was wrestling with the concept of
capacity development about which, with the support of people like Pete Morgan,
they did a lot of work. Here’s
a typical example
The most recent invitation is from the International Futures Forum – based in Scotland whose mission statement reads simply
to enable
people and organisations to flourish in powerful times. We address complex,
messy, seemingly intractable issues – local, global and all levels in between –
fostering practical hope and wise initiative.
We support
people making a difference in the face of all that stands in the way of making
a difference, rising to the challenge of the moment. We develop their
21st century competencies for thriving in complexity and their capacity for
inspiring and transformative innovation. We offer resources to support
this activity through the IFF Practice Centre. We work with governments,
communities, businesses, foundations and individuals.
We offer
people a space for reflection, thoughtful engagement and mutual support and we
freely share the powerful ideas, tools and frameworks that result.
I am apparently one of some 50 ex-pats who are being invited in a couple of weeks to take part in a zoom session to explore how we might become more involved. I like the idea and could access some of the material which is available in their IFF Practice Centre.
But I prefer a slightly more
independent approach and have therefore identified some books which I will try
to flick through in preparation…
I start in 1971 with the full edition of one of Futurology’s greats – Wendell Bell whose contribution to the field is superbly described in the first half of an article by Barbara Adam, the author of a 2007 study which figures in the list of about a dozen books
Title |
Author’s
background |
Comment |
The
Sociology of the Future – theory, cases and annotated bibliography; ed Wendell
Bell and James Mau (1971), |
One of America’s foremost
futurologists |
The book was a real challenge to
the prevailing quietism of Talcott Parsons’ sociology |
Futures we are in Fred Emery (1977) |
Renowned Australian organisational
thinker – with background in psychology |
But rather elitist and technocratic
style |
New Thinking for a new
Millennium – the knowledge base for future studies; Richard Slaughter
(1996) |
a
well-known Australian futurist. |
Superbly written |
Foundations of Future Studies;
Wendell Bell (1997) |
See
above |
The editions of 2004 and 2007 carry
great overviews of work since |
Future Matters – action, knowledge, ethics; B Adam and C Grove (2007). |
British sociologists |
a clear and thorough analysis |
Foresight – the art and
science of anticipating the future; Dennis Loveridge (2008) |
A british analytical chemist with
strong working experience in industry who took up an academic post on future
studies in 1991 |
Has the style and insights one
would expect from someone with his background |
What is the Future? John
Urry (2016) only in epub format. |
Urry was a great British
sociologist |
Comprehensive treatment strong on
bib references |
Superforecasting
; P Tetlock and D Gardner (2016) |
Paul Tetlock is an American
economics Prof who focuses on finance and statistics |
And has a reputation for scepticism
about forecasting |
Future Studies and Counterfactual Analyses – seeds of the Future; T Gordon and M Todorova (2019) |
futurologists – the older an
American with a scientific background, the younger a Bulgarian with a cultural
studies background |
|
Critical Terms in Future Studies;
ed Paul Heike (2019) |
An interesting collection of 50 international
academics whose subjects are generally in the humanities |
|
From What Is to What If – unleashing the power of imagination to
create the world we want Rob Hopkins (2019)
only in epub format. |
Climate change campaigner
|
This is, admittedly, Rob’s latest
contribution to his “Transition Towns” series and therefore not quite an
example of future studies |
Uncharted – how to map
the future together ; Margaret Heffernan
(2020) epub |
Serial entrepreneur American-born but currently living
in UK |
A curious book – strong on stories
– generally sceptical but strong on scenario planning |
The pandemic, we are told, is one of these critical junctures which shake the world from time to time and can move it in surprising directions….After the global financial crash of 2007 a lot of people’s predictions about government roles strengthening were proven false. The power of Big Capital increased – as did inequality. It took the populist revolt to begin to bring western liberalism to its senses.
The Covid pandemic has demonstrated
new possibilities for government that people will not forget in a hurry - but has
equally consolidated the power of the global AI and IT monopolies and
intensified our fears of a future without work.
Futurists should therefore be at a premium these days….
Postscript; interesting that,
within days of this post, I was invited by the Centre
for Public Impact to complete a questionnaire about ways of improving
government which focused on the sort of information I got from internet
platforms.
I had to respond quite strongly that
it is only books which help me understand realistic ways for improving
government – particularly those written by people such as Gerald Caiden, Chris
Hood, B Guy Peters, Eduardo Ongaro and Alasdair Roberts.
But the website is an interesting one – and pursuing a very worthwhile objective
No comments:
Post a Comment