As I reel under the number of books pouring from publishers, I have come to place more and more importance on three requirements which I look for in any book
- first a solid Introduction – or Preface. This is the author’s chance to show (s)he understands how overwhelmed we are by the choices; to offer us a convincing argument about why (s)he has to inflict yet another book on us. And the best way to do that is to give a brief summary of what others have written and identify the missing elements which make a book necessary. And I would like, in addition, to see a summary of each chapter…..I have always liked the old habit of prefacing a book chapter with an explanation of what that chapter will deal with. When I got hold recently of George Bernard Shaw’s The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism; (1928) it was to discover that his Table of Contents has no fewer than 33-pages...
- the second thing I look for in a non-fiction book is at the end - a (short) list of recommended reading, ideally with notes explaining the choice. Most books have a long “bibliography” which, I’ve taken to calling a “virility test” - demonstrating nothing more than (a barely compressed sense of) superiority. I want instead to see a shorter (and annotated) list for several reasons - partly to smoke out the author’s prejudices; partly to see how honest (s)he is; and partly to see how well (s)he writes
- the third check I
run is for the clarity of writing – with
suitable use of graphics and tables which are needed both to break up and to
illustrate the text….
All of these requirements are fairly quickly established – the book either offers such features – or it doesn’t. The decline and rise of democracy – a global history from antiquity to today by David Stasavage (2020), for example, is a book I came across yesterday and checked out. It doesn’t bother with any of these features – and is therefore quickly dismissed. It doesn’t even mention John Keane’s classic “The Rise and Fall of Democracy”
But I also need to be persuaded that the book in question has three other features --
- respects the basic facts
about an issue;
- has a coherent “narrative
structure” (see Richard Evans’ comments in the previous post)
- tries to be fair to the various sides of the key arguments on the issue
And this can be done only by checking the reviews.
But why, I suddenly thought,
do authors insist these days on giving us such hefty tomes?
Everyone’s
attention span – we are
told – is declining….particularly that
of the younger generation.
And so many non-fiction books
are just recycling arguments we’re already familiar with…
The obvious thing is to go back to the Victorian habit of summarising the basic argument of a book – along with an annotated bibliography – and to offer it as a TASTER of maximum 100 pages
Take, for example, a superb newly-released
book I have been reading today - Commanding
hope – the power we have to renew a world in peril; by Thomas Homer-Dixon. It
is an easy read; and addresses the issue which few such environmental books do –
namely why do people resist the message
about global warming?
It’s the first book I’ve come across which is devoted exclusively to this question of intellectual resistance - with 360 pages, its basic argument could be compressed into 100 pages - as a taster - an idea I'm now testing with "Dispatches to the Next Generation - a taster" (see top-right column of blog)
update; I'm glad to see I'm not alone in searching for ways to discover whether a book will be useful https://superorganizers.substack.com/p/surgical-reading-how-to-read-12-books
Dear Ronald Thank you for buying The Ruins of the Reich. Did you buy it as an ebook or as a paperback? The original draft was 840 pages long (!), but I managed to reduce it to 500 pages. The opening "Prelude" serves as an introduction. The last paragraph on p.4 explains what I will do and why. My editor also wanted me to explain in more depth the purpose of the book, but I just wanted to start the journey. The book trade edition has a bibliography at the back, which you might not get with the Amazon edition. I hope you find it interesting. Please let me know if you mention it on your blog, or if you have any further comments. That's a fabulous photo of Bucharest on your blog page. With best wishes
ReplyDeleteMichael
Thank you, Michael, for this gracious comment about your book - which I bought yesterday in the small English-language bookshop at Krezulescu Park.
DeleteUnable to spend the usual time browsing, I couldn’t actually apply my usual tests – and it was only when I got home with it that I noticed that its Intro didn’t refer to other books or to argue, for example, in what way it differs from Simon Winder’s rather eccentric “Germania” and “Danubia”. I realise that my arguments for detailed chapter summaries are a bit strange but they were seriously meant - as well as the points about the need to break up text. We are told that people have shorter attention spans these days - but book format still seems stuck in a time warp.....
Your bibliography is certainly interesting – with at least half of the books being in German – I might have added Grass’s “Peeling the Onion” memoir for the elegiac tone it gives to his memoir as well as Fritz Stern’s “Five Germanies I have known”.