The beauty of a book with large print is that it’s easy to go back and read – and that’s what I’ve been doing today with Bregman’s “Humankind – a hopeful history”. I also wanted to check out some references and landed up with some good material, including an interview and a discussion between Bregman and Steve Pinker.
But the main focus has been one of my famous tables which I’ve used to build a map of the various “research myths” about human nature which Bregman identified during the course of his writing – I’ve identified more than 20
I
draw two conclusions from my rereading
-
- first that, once a myth takes root, it’s very difficult
to shift. The media don’t like revisionism and never give equal space or
time to something that challenges the conventional wisdom – particularly if it
seems to contain a positive message.
- second that most people are
fairly decent – but power corrupts ie the
evil is in those with power and the battalions of police, soldiers, spies
and bureaucrats they control
Here’s Bregman with a couple of comments on two of the experiments -
The Stanford experiement
RB: Then many of these students said that they didn’t
want to do it. They didn’t want to do it because they said: No, that’s not who
I am. Then Zimbardo said: You got to do this because I need these results, then
we can go to the press and say look, prisons are horrible environments. We need
to reform the whole thing. That was actually a movement in the 60s where people
said, you know, we got to abolish prisons totally.
And the terrible irony of this movement, which, and Zimbardo
was part of that as well, is that it was
then later used by conservatives to say, oh, well, if prisons you know
don’t work at all, if rehabilitation is not an option, then, you know, let’s just
throw people in prison and throw away the key, right? Let’s just lock people up
for life, because then that’s the only option. It’s a history full of dark
ironies.
But yeah, the Stanford Prison Experiment is — I think it can
only be described as a hoax and it’s very sad that this has been taught to
students for 50 years.
The Milgram shocks
RB; It’s a problematic experiment as well. The archives have
opened up, again, and we now know that many of the subjects didn’t believe the
situation was real. And we also know that the people who went all the way, to
give 450 volt shocks, yeah, the chance that they would do that was higher if
they didn’t believe the whole thing was real. Maybe it was not 65 percent, as
Milgram initially reported, maybe it was 50 percent, or 40, or 30, but it’s
still way too high. It’s still a very dark and sinister experiment that shows
that, indeed, friendly people can do this.
But I do think the experiment needs to be reinterpreted. So
Milgram made the argument that people became sort of rigid robots, that they
just blindly followed orders, just as many Germans said after the war, you
know, “I was just following orders.”
But I think what really happened in that experiment was something different. It was about joining; it was about followership. It was about people wanting to help the scientist, and yes, sort of feeling part of his group — which is not a comfortable message, right? It’s not a comfortable message at all. We talked earlier about, you know, how so often we do the most horrible things in the name of loyalty and friendship. And I think that’s also how we should interpret this experiment.
Issue |
Initial thesis |
Revised analysis |
Bombing of German cities |
It would lower civilian
morale |
It boosted morale |
Hurricane Katrina |
Social breakdown |
Social support strong |
“mean world syndrome” |
The world is getting worse |
Stephen Pinker’s “The Better Angels
of our Nature” tells us that past 70 years have been much less violent. It’s
the media that stirs our pessimism and cynicism |
Homo economicus |
People are selfish |
They are altruistic and
cooperative |
Veneer theory of civilisation |
ditto |
“Only recently have
scientists concluded that the grim view of humanity needs revision” p19 |
“The Selfish Gene” |
Richard Dawkins original book |
Which he later disowned |
Lord of the Flies |
Even kids are aggressive |
The original boys in
Golding’s story actually rewarded cooperation |
Friendly foxes |
Darwinian selection rewards
aggression |
Russian geneticist
demonstrating selection breeds friendly foxes |
Cannibalistic apes |
Aggression is inbuilt |
Pinker wrong about violence of hunter-gatherers |
“Soldiers who don’t shoot” |
Fighting is natural |
Only about 15% of soldiers
fire their rifles |
“The curse of civilisation” |
When ice retreated, farming
became possible and progress started |
Settled life was
labour-intensive; possessions and leadership developed – sickness and
violence started |
“The Mystery of Easter Island” |
Large statues were rolled
into place with logs – requiring chopping down of forests – people then
turned on one another (Mulloy 1974) |
Duly repeated in J Diamond’s
“Collapse” (2005). |
Stanford University |
1971 experiment - Students separated
into prisoners and jailors and role-played – with sadism and violence
resulting |
When students protested they
were told that results needed to prove that prisons didn’t work. Zimbardo
published that research in 1973. Martinsen then pushed that thesis – with strong
media support – although his subsequent retraction got no publicity |
Stanley Milgram’s shock
machine |
1961 experiment which had
psychology students apply ever-stronger voltage to control subjects |
Follow-up research indicated
that many students understood it was a mock study |
38 New York Bystanders |
1964 incident when a young woman
loudly stabbed to death – with no one going to her rescue. A few days later, the killer was apprehended by 2 bystanders |
Experiment confirmed there was a “bystander effect” when people thought that others would deal with sit. No media reported fact that it was 2 bystanders who caught the killer Meta analysis pub in 2011. In
90% of cases people help! |
James Q Wilson started this
with a 1982 article in The Atlantic which was taken up by Mayor Giuliana and police
Commissioner Bratton |
A 2015 meta-analysis disproved
a theory which had cops arresting anyone for minor felons. Demographic trends
were the basic cause of the decline in crime. |
|
German fighting zeal in 2nd
WW |
Janowitz and Shils discover
that German soldiers fight for camaraderie |
But outsiders don’t count 95% of soldier deaths in 2nd
WW were from “distance” weapons |
The Pygmalion effect |
Humans can and should be classified into positive and negative categories |
Expectations are self-reinforcing - it’s the basis of theory X
and theory Y schools of management. If you assume people are lazy, they will
prove you right – and vv |
Monetary rewards can demotivate |
People need financial rewards
to achieve |
Edward Deci
has demonstrated that bonuses are generally perverse |
The tragedy of the commons |
G Harin wrote an article with
this title in 1968 which argued that people abused common land eg overgrazing |
Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel
prize in 2009 for proving him wrong – starting with a famous Workshop in 1973
to study the “commons” and her 1990 book “Governing the Commons” |
Norway’s prisons |
The US incarcerates about 10
times more people in prisons than the average country |
Norway’s low recidivism rates
demonstrate a better way |
Drinking tea with terrorists |
Heavy prion sentences are the
normal recourse |
Dutch and Danish treatment show
there is a more effective way |
One of the most serious and systematic reviews of any book I have ever encountered - https://www.academia.edu/43631182/On_Rutger_Bregmans_Humankind_Minor_revisions_22_September_2020_
https://nomadron.blogspot.com/2019/07/human-nature_11.html
Bregman and Pinker
discussion https://thepanpsycast.com/panpsycast2/episode80-1
The Power Paradox
-
http://www.ippanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Power-Paradox-Leakey.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment