what you get here

This is not a blog which opines on current events. It rather uses incidents, books (old and new), links and papers to muse about our social endeavours.
So old posts are as good as new! And lots of useful links!

The Bucegi mountains - the range I see from the front balcony of my mountain house - are almost 120 kms from Bucharest and cannot normally be seen from the capital but some extraordinary weather conditions allowed this pic to be taken from the top of the Intercontinental Hotel in late Feb 2020

Sunday, October 18, 2020

How Myths take root and are difficult to shift

The beauty of a book with large print is that it’s easy to go back and read – and that’s what I’ve been doing today with Bregman’s “Humankind – a hopeful history”. I also wanted to check out some references and landed up with some good material, including an interview and a discussion between Bregman and Steve Pinker.

But the main focus has been one of my famous tables which I’ve used to build a map of the various “research myths” about human nature which Bregman identified during the course of his writing – I’ve identified more than 20

I draw two conclusions from my rereading -

- first that, once a myth takes root, it’s very difficult to shift. The media don’t like revisionism and never give equal space or time to something that challenges the conventional wisdom – particularly if it seems to contain a positive message.

- second that most people are fairly decent – but power corrupts ie the evil is in those with power and the battalions of police, soldiers, spies and bureaucrats they control

Here’s Bregman with a couple of comments on two of the experiments -

     The Stanford experiement

RB: Then many of these students said that they didn’t want to do it. They didn’t want to do it because they said: No, that’s not who I am. Then Zimbardo said: You got to do this because I need these results, then we can go to the press and say look, prisons are horrible environments. We need to reform the whole thing. That was actually a movement in the 60s where people said, you know, we got to abolish prisons totally.

And the terrible irony of this movement, which, and Zimbardo was part of that as well, is that it was  then later used by conservatives to say, oh, well, if prisons you know don’t work at all, if rehabilitation is not an option, then, you know, let’s just throw people in prison and throw away the key, right? Let’s just lock people up for life, because then that’s the only option. It’s a history full of dark ironies.

But yeah, the Stanford Prison Experiment is — I think it can only be described as a hoax and it’s very sad that this has been taught to students for 50 years.

 

The Milgram shocks

RB; It’s a problematic experiment as well. The archives have opened up, again, and we now know that many of the subjects didn’t believe the situation was real. And we also know that the people who went all the way, to give 450 volt shocks, yeah, the chance that they would do that was higher if they didn’t believe the whole thing was real. Maybe it was not 65 percent, as Milgram initially reported, maybe it was 50 percent, or 40, or 30, but it’s still way too high. It’s still a very dark and sinister experiment that shows that, indeed, friendly people can do this.

But I do think the experiment needs to be reinterpreted. So Milgram made the argument that people became sort of rigid robots, that they just blindly followed orders, just as many Germans said after the war, you know, “I was just following orders.”

But I think what really happened in that experiment was something different. It was about joining; it was about followership. It was about people wanting to help the scientist, and yes, sort of feeling part of his group — which is not a comfortable message, right? It’s not a comfortable message at all. We talked earlier about, you know, how so often we do the most horrible things in the name of loyalty and friendship. And I think that’s also how we should interpret this experiment.

 And then the table

Issue

 

Initial thesis

Revised analysis

Bombing of German cities

It would lower civilian morale

It boosted morale

Hurricane Katrina

 

Social breakdown

Social support strong

“mean world syndrome”

The world is getting worse

Stephen Pinker’s “The Better Angels of our Nature” tells us that past 70 years have been much less violent. It’s the media that stirs our pessimism and cynicism

Homo economicus

 

People are selfish

They are altruistic and cooperative

Veneer theory of civilisation

ditto

“Only recently have scientists concluded that the grim view of humanity needs revision” p19

“The Selfish Gene”

Richard Dawkins original book

Which he later disowned

Lord of the Flies

Even kids are aggressive

The original boys in Golding’s story actually rewarded cooperation

Friendly foxes

Darwinian selection rewards aggression

Russian geneticist demonstrating selection breeds friendly foxes

Cannibalistic apes

Aggression is inbuilt

Pinker wrong about  violence of hunter-gatherers

“Soldiers who don’t shoot”

Fighting is natural

Only about 15% of soldiers fire their rifles

“The curse of civilisation”

When ice retreated, farming became possible and progress started

Settled life was labour-intensive; possessions and leadership developed – sickness and violence started

“The Mystery of Easter Island”

Large statues were rolled into place with logs – requiring chopping down of forests – people then turned on one another (Mulloy 1974)

Duly repeated in J Diamond’s “Collapse” (2005).

 Reality was that rats destroyed the forests and western ships brought slavery and plague

Stanford University

1971 experiment - Students separated into prisoners and jailors and role-played – with sadism and violence resulting

When students protested they were told that results needed to prove that prisons didn’t work. Zimbardo published that research in 1973. Martinsen then pushed that thesis – with strong media support – although his subsequent retraction got no publicity

Stanley Milgram’s shock machine

1961 experiment which had psychology students apply ever-stronger voltage to control subjects

Follow-up research indicated that many students understood it was a mock study

38 New York Bystanders

1964 incident when a young woman loudly stabbed to death – with no one going to her rescue.

A few days later, the  killer was apprehended by 2 bystanders

Experiment confirmed there was a “bystander effect” when people thought that others would deal with sit.

No media reported fact that it was 2 bystanders who caught the killer

Meta analysis pub in 2011. In 90% of cases people help!

The “Broken Windows” theory

James Q Wilson started this with a 1982 article in The Atlantic which was taken up by Mayor Giuliana and police Commissioner Bratton

A 2015 meta-analysis disproved a theory which had cops arresting anyone for minor felons. Demographic trends were the basic cause of the decline in crime. Arguably the strategy has led to racial profiling and increased police aggression

German fighting zeal in 2nd WW

Janowitz and Shils discover that German soldiers fight for camaraderie

But outsiders don’t count

95% of soldier deaths in 2nd WW were from “distance” weapons

The Pygmalion effect

Humans can and should be classified into positive and negative categories

Expectations are self-reinforcing - it’s the basis of theory X and theory Y schools of management. If you assume people are lazy, they will prove you  right – and vv

Monetary rewards can demotivate

People need financial rewards to achieve

Edward Deci has demonstrated that bonuses are generally perverse

The tragedy of the commons

G Harin wrote an article with this title in 1968 which argued that people abused common land eg overgrazing

Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel prize in 2009 for proving him wrong – starting with a famous Workshop in 1973 to study the “commons” and her 1990 book “Governing the Commons”

Norway’s prisons

The US incarcerates about 10 times more people in prisons than the average country

Norway’s low recidivism rates demonstrate a better way

Drinking tea with terrorists

Heavy prion sentences are the normal recourse

Dutch and Danish treatment show there is a more effective way

 Further Reading

One of the most serious and systematic reviews of any book I have ever encountered - https://www.academia.edu/43631182/On_Rutger_Bregmans_Humankind_Minor_revisions_22_September_2020_

https://nomadron.blogspot.com/2019/07/human-nature_11.html

Bregman and Pinker discussion https://thepanpsycast.com/panpsycast2/episode80-1

The Power Paradox -

http://www.ippanetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Power-Paradox-Leakey.pdf

https://leakeyfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Origin-Stories-Episode-20-The-Power-Paradox-LIVE.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment