I’ve been spending a fair amount of time these past few
weeks going over the year’s posts (60) to try to give them a little bit more
“shape” ie coherence. It was probably this post
back in June which planted the idea of the need
for some editing of my posts. For whatever reason, there does seem to have been
more of a pattern to my writing this year..
The interest in organisational reform didn’t entirely peter out – but
morphed into a larger concern about systems of power and the State..
I will, in a few days, be uploading this year’s collection
of posts which also shows that an important thread running through the year has
been the need for writing which – as one
post put it -
jolts me – not for its own sake but to help first identify minds which look at the world in original ways but which also understand that clear language is an essential tool for such originality…Recently deceased essayist Tom Wolfe was a favourite of mine ever since I first read his Mau Mauing the flak catchers in 1970 but the “creative writing” courses which have contaminated journalism in the past few decades have made me suspicious of even good journalists these days. James Meek remains an exception for his ability to reduce economic complexities to 5 or 10 thousand word essays – ditto Jonathan Meades for his forensic analyses of cultural issues.
But it was Arthur
Koestler who first stunned me (in my late teens) with memorable
writing – hardly surprising given his amazing background. Only Victor Serge
could rival the enormity of the events which shaped him. How can those who have
known only a quiet bourgeois English life possibly give us insights into other
worlds? And yet a few writers manage to do it.
But somehow,
academic specialists are rarely able to produce prose which grips…Is it the
unrealistic restriction of the scope of their inquiries vision which causes the
deadness of their prose – or perhaps the ultra security of their institutional
base??
It’s this
question which led me to offer this matrix of good journalistic writers –
dividing them according to their focus on people, ideas, events and places.
This made me realise, in turn, the fine line there
is between such categories as journalist, novelist and travel writer. Or perhaps the distinction is, more properly, that between
generalists and specialists – with the latter including not only travel writers
but those who focus on books, films, drama and art (designated "critics") and sports (of
each variety – including politics). And
the former covering essentially those we refer to, derogatively, as “hacks” –
since what they do is to hack out “news” from the public relations handouts
they receive
I accept that the focus of my table on the former
type of writer is as a result somewhat elitist....
I wanted to include examples from countries beyond the UK
and managed 20 – whose nationalities are clearly designated in the table. I’ve
tried googling (in French and in German) to try to get a sense of who might be
the equivalent European journalists but the google curse of neophilia
means that only references to younger names are given….
Good “Journalistic”
writers – by focus, base and nationality
Source of income
|
People
|
Ideas
|
Events
|
Places
|
Mixed genres
|
freelance
|
Naomi Klein (Can)
|
|
Hans Magnus Enzensberger
(Ger)
Arundati Roy (India)
Joan Didion US
Tariq Ali (Pak/UK)
|
||
Academia
|
Biographers
|
Mark Greif USA
Mark Lilla USA
Perry Anderson USA
|
Historians
Political scientists
Economists
|
Geographers
Anthropologists
Sociologists
|
Raymond Aron (France)
Michael Pollan USA
|
Journal newspaper
television
|
Oriana Fallaci (It)
|
Francois
Bondy
(Sw)
Claude Roy (Fr)
|
Vasily Grossman (Ru)
Seb Haffner (Ger)
Joseph Roth (Ger)
Rudolf Augstein (Ger)
|
Luigi Barzini (It)
Andrew Sampson
Svetlana Alexievich
(Belarussia)
Robert Kaplan (US)
|
|
Think Tank
|
Susan
George
(US)
|
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete