For almost 30 years I have been living in central european countries
(actually seven of the years were in central Asia) and working on projects designed to adjust their administrative and
political cultures to European (indeed ”global”) norms of transparency and
accountability.
A battery of techniques (variations of ”stick”, carrot and moral rhetoric)
has been used over this period - by a legion of missionaries
and mercenaries from organisations such as the World Bank, OECD, the EC and
private consultancies - to pursue this task.
I drew on my own experience to present in 2011 a detailed analysis - The Long Game – not the
log-frame – with the title
trying to summarise the main thrust of the paper’s argument that too much emphasis
was laid on rationalistic techniques which didn’t fit the local context - and
which were expected to deliver overambitious results in ridiculously short time-periods.
The paper coined the phrase ”impervious
regimes” to suggest not only that the elites of these countries treated
their citizens with utter disdain but that this was hard-wired into their DNA –
ie that the underlying social values made it difficult for the elites to behave
in any other way....
There was a further strand to the argument I have been conducting for more
than a decade – namely that the management techniques imported into these
countries by the missionaries and mercenaries (who have morphed into local
experts) have given the ”power elite” a new weapon in the armoury used to keep
citizens in servility....
I might indeed have added that the EC’s Structural Funds have also given a
powerful additional boost to the corruption which had for so long been systemic
in most of the countries....
But I realised yesterday that this ”values” and ”path dependency” argument
is far too static....after all, so much of my writing of the past 20 years has
been about the moral corruption of our very own ”Western elites” (see the latest version of Dispatches
to the Next Generation) .....
This week I came across an
important book by the famous Francis Fukuyama - which he had written in 1999 but
which had passed me by - The Great Disruption – human nature and the
reconstitution of social order and which is a critique of the loosening of our social fabric
(and declining social trust) which he argued has been going on since 1965.
At first glance, it bears
some similarities to Christopher Lasch’s The
Culture of Narcissism which does, however, bear the curious sub-title
“American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations”.
Both books are important
correctives to the all-too-familiar refrain from “the West” that “the East” has
some catching up to do….More importantly they touch on a theme central to this
blog’s very existence – the tension
between what I might call “the moral universe” and “technocracy”. Remember
one of the quotations which grace this blog (if you scroll far enough down the
right-hand boxes) –
"We've spent half a century arguing over management methods. If there are solutions to our confusions over government, they lie in democratic not management processes" JR Saul (1992)
Tomorrow I will try to
pick up the argument where I seem to have left it all of six years ago........
No comments:
Post a Comment