Yesterday’s
post was sparked off by a book and a paper with this title. Kzarnic’s paper was written in 2007 (although I came
across only yesterday in the book) and is simply the best introduction to the
topic I have come across – identifying what for him are the core approaches
which the various intellectual disciplines offer to explain change – whether
that change is described as “technical”, “economic”, “political” or “organizational”.
And adding some multi-disciplinary approaches for good measure….
Green’s
book focuses on one very small part of the picture - “people power” in poor
“developing” countries, emphasizing right from the start that -
Activists seeking social and political change usually focus their efforts on those who wield visible power, presidents, prime ministers and CEOs, since they hold apparent authority over the matter at hand. Yet the hierarchy of visible power is underpinned by subtle interactions among a more diverse set of players. Hidden power‘ describes what goes on behind the scenes: the lobbyists, the corporate chequebooks, the Old Boys Network.
Hidden power also comprises the shared view of what those in power consider sensible or reasonable in public debate. Any environmentalist who has sat across the table from government officials or mainstream economists and dared to question the advisability of unlimited economic growth in a resource-constrained world will have met the blank faces that confront anyone breaching those boundaries.
I’m long
enough in the tooth to have seen many times the “conventional wisdom” of
everyday conversation become a forgotten tale and am constantly amazed by how
easily people move from one discredited world view to another without beginning
to develop some scepticism about that conventional wisdom……
Yesterday’s
post tracked my own journey of discovery about “change” and power – first as a
Scottish politician working with
community groups, political colleagues, official advisers, academics and
journalists; and, since 1990, as a consultant working to European bureaucracy and with
Central European and Central Asian technocrats and politicians – local and
national – all the time trying to keep up with the burgeoning relevant
literature in fields such as “managing change”, “institutional reform” and
“developing capacities”
This
experience suggests that there are actually four very different bodies of thinking and writing about “change – and how it happens” - each
using different language and each with different audiences and loyalties…..
- Managing Change –
the “management of change” literature was written by management consultants
looking for markets and hit a peak about 15 years ago. The
ultimate business guru book is an excellent introduction to the people and
ideas on which that genre drew. Critical
management studies (CMS) was an interesting (if badly written) radical academic
response to the overfocus of those writings on senior business executives with
power and authority.
- People Power – the
literature of what we might call “Social
change” is diverse and developing fast as the sense of crisis develops. It
includes such fields as self-help, community enterprise and social movements
and, for me, offers the best written and least self-serving material. Ronald
Douthwaite’s Short
Circuit – strengthening local economies for security in an unstable world (2003)
is still one of the best
arguments for social enterprise. Tarrow’s Power in Movement: Social
Movements and Contentious Politics is a good summary of the last group.
International Charities (such as Oxfam) also make an important contribution to
thinking….
- State Reform –
it’s amazing to realise that Public Sector
Reform (PSR) is only about 25 years old….the writings come almost exclusively
from academics and consultants and either ape that of change management; or of
the deconstructionists of CMS. Increasingly the literature on “change” has been
coming from state bodies (national and international) such as The World Bank,
OECD, Asian Development Bank, ODI etc and is addressed to senior officials,
academics (and journalists?)…
- The White Heat
of Technology – everyone’s great hope in
the face of the environmental and financial disasters (which people have
eventually understood) now face the world….We are overwhelmed by the books
which all sorts of people have been pouring out in the past decade giving us
the stories of the technological, economic and social forces which produced
(and change) the world in which we now live.
Coincidentally,
the first thing I found in this morning’s surfing was a presentation by Chris
Martenson’s about his Crash
course – a full version of which can be accessed here. That single
hour’s viewing told me more than I had learned in the several hours it took me
last week to read Naomi Klein’s This
Changes Everything.
The
presentation nicely complemented last week’s reading of Frederic Laloux’s Reinventing Organisations - a book which has apparently been making waves in Europe. His basic argument is that
the wave of the future is joint-ownership
and his
book celebrates
those companies (some quite large) which have adopted that principle and
identifies some of the preconditions, systems and procedures which seem to
account for its success.
No comments:
Post a Comment