Glorious sun yesterday in Sofia with pavement
cafes full of people tasting an early spring day as I emerged from the Rodina Hotel
after some swimming and exercise.
Although the English newspapers seemed to have moved on to
other topics, feelings are still very high in this part of the world about the
latest example of perfidious Albion – threatened restrictions on the free movement of labour from January 2014. Britain was, after all, one of the governments pushing for
early entry of Bulgaria and Romania ten years ago (and indeed was one of only
three EU members to allow open access after 2004 to citizens of the 7 new member
states who joined then).
The accusation of inconsistency misses a crucial point – that
it was a Labour Government (1997 to 2010) which did these things. The Cameron
government which is now in charge is a government of upper-class ideologues who
want to go one better than Thatcher in the breaking of the old “social
contract” which the UK benefited from the end of the second-world war to about
1980. Further marketization, attack on welfare benefits are the basic strategy
– although they were not mentioned in the respective manifestoes of the
coalition partners. Of course open immigration fits such a neo-liberal approach
- but loses the votes necessary to pursue such policies. Immigration has been a
major issue in British (or at least English) politics for the past 50 years –
and some of the reasons are set out in the fascinating diagram which shows thevarious waves of immigration to Britain in the last couple of centuries – particularly those of the last 60 or so
years. Although
an English politician did in the 1960s make an infamous speech warning of
“rivers flowing with blood” if the immigration (of West Indians then)
continued, the UK had, until the early 1980s, a net negative flow of migration.
More people were leaving than coming in.
This all changed 30 years ago – due to a new flow of Asian immigrants many of whom do not easily integrate. When 7 central European countries joined the European Union in 2004, the UK was one of only 3 countries (the others being Ireland and Sweden) to allow unrestricted entry on to the labour market for the citizens of those 7 countries. The government advisers had anticipated only a small flow – but grossly underestimated the scale. That’s why 3 years later, the government took a more restrictive approach to Bulgaria and Romania – for a period which runs out in January next year.
This all changed 30 years ago – due to a new flow of Asian immigrants many of whom do not easily integrate. When 7 central European countries joined the European Union in 2004, the UK was one of only 3 countries (the others being Ireland and Sweden) to allow unrestricted entry on to the labour market for the citizens of those 7 countries. The government advisers had anticipated only a small flow – but grossly underestimated the scale. That’s why 3 years later, the government took a more restrictive approach to Bulgaria and Romania – for a period which runs out in January next year.
England has actually benefitted from the professionals and students
who have come to England – it is actually Bulgaria and Romania who have
suffered from the loss of highly-skilled doctors and young people. The real fear is,
of course, that the 2014 relaxation will first bring in the gypsies – who have been
the bane of France and Germany (German cities have become very concerned about the scale and effects of such immigration) - after which, the British Conservatives fear, they will lose votes (in England) to the nationalist UKIP and thereby the next General Election in 2015. Pity that the Conservatives are so insular that they did not think of cooperating with the French, Germans (and Italians) to explore ways of dealing with immigrants who harass and steal from the public. My understanding is that deportation (as France found out) is a difficult option legally.
Tom Gallagher makes an important wider point in his article on the issues -
That world citizen Tony Blair actually turned up in the Romanian parliament in May 1999 and promised them that the gates of Europe would be flung open for them if they would help NATO in its confrontation with the Serbian ruler Milosevic over his ill-treatment of his Albanian subjects in Kosovo.The satirical poster is one of Franz Juttner's - "The British sing hymns - but think of war"
Not only did they comply, but they made huge economic sacrifices to prepare Romania for full membership of the EU in 2007. Britain was their chief sponsor and the 20 million Romanians were regularly told that their living standards would start to approach the EU norms if they swallowed the harsh medicine. Instead, it will take centuries for this to occur. They privatised their industry, abandoned their price subsidies and allowed massive economic dumping by powerful EU states only to find that they cannot make ends meet at home with derisory salaries. Their sleazy political elite allied to the British Liberals and Labour have been the only real local beneficiaries of membership.
No comments:
Post a Comment