Everyone these days apparently needs to have a “theory of change” – although such an expectation has been with us for only a couple of decades. It’s something we can largely thank the development field for – although I suspect the “change management” literature had a big hand. None of the many documents available when you google the term bother to give a history of the term – and it is Wikipedia that comes up trumps with a fascinating history of the phrase
I spent April musing about “change” because a friend had invited me to do some zoom interviews about the significant change strategy I had been responsible for in Scotland’s largest Region for more than a decade. Here's the first interview - which may take a few minutes to download.
The subsequent posts covered a lot more than the strategy – exploring such things as the wider social, political and context of post-war Britain; the influence of the Johnson’s “War on Poverty”; issues of power and powerlessness; how those with power manipulate us; and the curiously compartmentalised way we talk about change.
I’m still trying to make sense of what was an important series of posts and offer one of my tables to help me (and my readers) in that process. Just click on the relevant title and you’ll get the post
Title |
Issues covered |
Change is normally
discussed in a highly compartmentalised way – with psychologists looking at individuals;
consultants at organisations and sociologists at entire societies. Only
recently have a few people tried to make the connections between these levels |
|
“Pincers”, “windows of
opportunity”, “contagion” and the “laboratory” have been useful metaphors |
|
The seven ways in which we
are kept in line - as citizens, employees and consumers. And the variety of methods
used to do so. Although there’s been a huge interest in past decade in
behaviour, I haven’t seen anyone else attempt such a tabulation. |
|
Recalling the spirit of the
1960s – the UK version of the US war on poverty – participation |
|
How the US debate on “community
power” helped shape Strathclyde Region’s “Social Strategy for the Eighties” |
|
|
the texts which
influenced my generation |
Offering a tentative
explanation of how and why we developed the Strategy – and what its main planks
were |
|
Using a “change
management” writer’s checklist to test the Strategy – it works! |
|
We’ve
forgotten the wisdom of 30 years ago |
No comments:
Post a Comment