Although one of my favourite genres is intellectual history, books about the history of economic ideas or of political philosophy tend to be somewhat boring – it’s as if the requirement to be comprehensive robs the author of his/her passion. I’m thinking, for example, of Roger Backhouse’s Penguin “History of Economics” (2002)
But – as I noted a year or so ago – the last decade has seen significant improvements
The academic community has
always taken a dim view of popularisation – the eminent economist JK
Galbraith who wrote “The Affluent Society” in 1958 suffered very much from
academic jealousy as did the historian AJP Taylor in the same period – so it is
great that some writers and journalists have turned increasingly to the world
of science and ideas.
Grand Pursuit;
the story of economic genius (2011) is a good example.  Written
by Sylvia Nasar, a Professor of journalism (who also produced “A Beautiful
Mind” about game theorist John Nash), it attracted a rather sniffy
review from one of the doyens of Economics - Robert Solow..  
Not, however, that I want to
discourage academics from writing well and for the general public! I was
delighted to discover recently a “popular” book by academic philosopher James
Miller Examined
Lives – from Socrates to Nietzsche with a nice interview here. Alan Ryan
is another academic who writes well although his On
Politics is just a bit too voluminous a history of political thought
for me. These extensive
notes give a useful sense of what would be in store for any brave
reader
And a foray into my favourite Bucharest (remaindered English) bookshop duly unearthed “50 Economics Classics – your shortcut to the most important ideas about capitalism, finance and the global economy” by Tom Butler-Bowden (2017) - one of a series I had never heard of but which promises to top the amended list of my next “Most Accessible Reads on Economics”.
His approach is to select and summarise (in a few pages) 50 books whose focus span the key issues tackled by economics - over a 200-year period. Included are both old and new “classics” – Pikety and Graeber as well as Marx and Hayek.
Most
such books go for the chronological
approach – with the result that readers tend to flick the opening pages and
pick up interest only toward the book’s middle. Perhaps it’s the influence of
post-modernism, but it’s pure genius that
this author goes instead for what might be called the “fatalistic” approach and selects
his books instead alphabetically    
As
a result, for example, Milton Friedmann rubs shoulders with JK Galbraith; Naomi
Klein with Keynes; Adam Smith with Hernando de Soto etc
And, naturally, there are as many historians and journalists in the list as pure economists…..he even lists for each entry the books with which it can be compared…..
I’ve
developed one of my famous tables as a tribute – with my final column amending
in some cases what some might fault as a generous attitude to the market…
I’ll start with the first dozen……
| Book/Author | Year | Issue | Argument | 
| “Lords
  of Finance” L Ahamed | 2009 | The
  gold standard and the 1920s | Fixed
  ideas in economics can have disastrous results | 
| “The
  microtheory of innovation” WJBaumol | 2010 | Entrepreneurship | We
  neglect those to take risks at our peril | 
| “Human
  Capital” Garry Becker | 1964 | Unfortunately
  the book spawned the dreadful notion of human resources | The
  most important investment we make is in ourselves | 
| The
  Second Machine Age | 2014 | Probably
  the most famous of the techno-optimist books about IT | “Techno
  revolutions have to allow for the advance of everyone” | 
| “23
  things they don’t tell you about capitalism” Ha-Joon Chang | 2011 | An
  early mass book questioning economic orthodoxy | Many
  nations advanced by breaking the rules of orthodox economics | 
| “The
  Firm, the market and the Law” Ronald Coase | 1988 | One
  of the most famous articles in the history of the subject | Why
  firms exist – the role of transaction costs | 
| “GDP;
  a brief but affectionate history” Diane Coyle | 2014 | This
  index of economic success (like economics) rests on some very questionable
  assumptions | How
  we measure inputs and outputs has significant effects on people and nations | 
| “Innovation
  and Entrepreneurship” Peter Drucker | 1985 | It’s
  as important as the traditional factors of land, labour and capital |  | 
| “The
  Ascent of Money” Niall Ferguson | 2008 | A
  british historian who likes to provoke and scandalize – but writes well | Finance
  has been the crucial ladder in the making of the modern world | 
| “Capitalism
  and Freedom” Milton Friedman | 1962 | Funded
  by “The Reader’s Digest” and dodgy billionaires to pull the wool over our
  eyes | A
  hymn to the free market | 
| “The
  Great Crash” JK Galbraith | 1955 | One
  of the classic analyses of the Great Depression        | It’s
  apparently government’s job to stop speculative frenzies | 
| “Progress
  and Poverty” Henry George | 1879 | His
  ideas still live | When
  land – rather than people and production – is taxed, prosperity increases | 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment