It’s
difficult these days to be objective about the European Union – the combination
of the euro crisis, austerity and the immigration set off by the 2004 widening
has given so many easy targets and scapegoats.
“The
European Project” went from strength to strength (with a short breather until
Delors became President in the 1980s) – until hubris set in at the start of the
new millennium. The Euro was launched in 2002 with a great fanfare but, in less
than a decade, has dragged the entire project into disrepute; the attempt to
foist a new Convention on European Nations hit major hurdles very quickly with
French and Dutch rejections of the draft in 2005. All the while, however, the
European Court of Justice has been throbbing quietly in the basement, supplying
the legality if not the legitimacy to the regulations drafted by the Commission
with its supportive infrastructure of lobbyists and officials.
Intellectual
coverage of this unique venture has been massive – with academia queuing up to receive
generous European funding. Did you know, for example, that there were, at
the last count, 409 Jean Monnet Professorial Chairs in European Universities –
funded for the initial 3 years by the EU? Four Hundred and Nine!!
The
natural scepticism of journalists has been kept in place by a combination of EC
press releases; editorial control of newspapers whose owners are (to a man)
pro-European; and by budgets which no longer permit detached scrutiny.
I
told you it was difficult to be objective!
The
UK, of course, is home to “the awkward squad” which has an innate resistance to
overblown rhetoric and projects. Tom Gallagher’s latest book - Europe’s
Path to Crisis – disintegration via monetary union - is a great read in that tradition eg the 2003
blockbuster “The Great Deception – can
the European Union Survive?; the rather more philosophical The
Tainted Source; and the incendiary 1995 book The Rotten Heart of Europe –the dirty war for Europe’s money by one of the guys behind the moves toward
monetary integration (Bernard Connelly) whose detailed analysis was so
explosive that he was not only sacked from the Commission but banned
from further critical writing on the subject. Curiously for a book which
was honoured with a Danish award for moral courage, Amazon cannot offer the
book – not give any comment on it
Tom
Gallagher, whom I readily admit to being a friend, is no stranger to
controversy - with a fascination for the undergrowth of political activity not
only in the Balkans (an early specialism) but in the Celtic fringes of Portugal
(1980s) and Scotland (most recently). Romania hardly qualifies in that category
but has been a fruitful harvest for his ruthless probing - initially with Romania
– theft of a nation, latterly with Romania
and the European Union – how the weak vanquished the strong (2010)
Possibly
it was that second book which gave him the idea for this latest book which is very
clearly not another technical study of the eurocrisis - but rather a very
political analysis (with scrupulous references) which carries an unspoken
question about hubris.
His “Europe’s
Path to Crisis” has inspired me to try to identify the more balanced of the
critical writing on Europe - particularly those which can go beyond the critique and have an alternative agenda which might be worth exploring. To reach these (rare) sites, you have to wade
through not only angry nationalist sites but also some which purport to be critical
but which turn out to have European funding!
The
best guide is probably this recent one from Cardiff University. I doubt, however, anyone has a realistic agenda which can satisfy both multinational interests and the frustration of European citizens.....
The recent appointment of Juncker as President of the Commission was hardly calculated to
inspire confidence (not that this has ever seemed a consideration for the
European political class) but recent revelations about the tax evasions which
have been an integral
part of the Luxembourg system over which Juncker presided for so many years
so seem to be the last straw.
My
surfing also threw up this interesting book on The sociology of Europe - and my mail, coincidentally, this New Pact for Europe - produced by a collection of worthy Foundations (including the Bertelsmann and Gulbenkian ones).
Great rhetoric - but little reference to the hard economic, ecological and political realities I have been writing about in recent posts (the bibliography kills the report's credibility for me).
Great rhetoric - but little reference to the hard economic, ecological and political realities I have been writing about in recent posts (the bibliography kills the report's credibility for me).
No comments:
Post a Comment